For some time now I am noticing that if mainstream tells you something, 95% of the time its exact opposite of that.
I know Adolf Hitler did some nasty stuff but I never believed he was insane and just evil.
Now I am starting to think,he was probably one of most informed human beings at that tim,I mean if I was to bet on who had best access to information at that time, he probably had intel from all areas, chances are he knew much more than we do today,so it got me wondering, is there a chance, a slim chance, there was some valid reason behind what he did to Jewish ?
Knowledge implies perceivable...ignoring it for suggested represents self deception. Others utilize suggestion to tempt ignorance of perceivable, while pretending to be the deceivers...hence all the costumes; masks; narratives and players on the world stage.
a) what does "or" imply? A choice in-between. What defines choice? Being a reaction within enacting balance, since only within balance can there be choice.
b) right vs wrong and good vs bad implies imbalance, hence the conflict(versus) in-between.
c) what if choice within balance (need/want) can be tempted into imbalance (want vs not want)? What if the choice to ignore need for want represents imbalance within balance? What if perceivable represents need; while suggested represents want?