Natural Law is naturally known but after the Magna Carta, it consisted of 4 laws. All other laws must be agreed on by us all. Nobody can just write laws and expect us to follow them without our approval.
-
Don’t kill.
-
Don’t steal.
-
Don’t assault any person (includes rape) or their property.
-
Honor all contracts.
The Constitution states we are under Natural Law as well but the Politicians slowly fooled People into Statute Admiralty Law which isn’t even valid except for Gov workers.
Reclaim Natural Law Rights verbally anywhere you think it’s viable.
Those are Luciferian belief systems. They believe in the law of the jungle where anything goes.
In Christian Natural Law (as it was once called) we have a contract with each other not to kill, steal, assault or break contracts. We all naturally know Right from Wrong.
You are repeating the tenants of Satanism.
The rest of us believe we all know Right VS Wrong and so it’s natural to do Right and wrong to do wrong.
So what will you do? Continue posting here or actually go out and do something?
I do stuff all the time offline. Any chance I get, I expose deep state shills right to their face like when I’m at the dmv or any deep state connected agency. Waking people up left and right and shining a light on darkness eventually leads to a massive United People with enough power to shake off the deep state.
Neither of these represents natural law, hence suggesting restrictions upon free will of choice. Even if 8 billion others suggest one to not kill, steal and assault...one still represents the free will of choice within perceivable.
a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law tempts one to ignore balance (enacting) to choice (reaction) natural law.
b) nature sets apart (from whole into partial); merchants use CONTRACT, verb - "to draw together"
c) HON'OR, noun - "the esteem due or paid to worth; high estimation". Estimation (perceiving choice) of worth (perceivable balance) is ignored when consenting to suggested values (contracts and rules of behavior).
CONSTITUTE, verb - "to give formal existence to". Only flow (process of dying) gives formal (living) existence.
Consenting to suggested "we" tempts the "one" (partial) to ignore "oneness" (whole).
RE (response to) CLAIM (want of possession) tempts one to ignore need to resist (living) the temptation of wanting (process of dying).
The ignorance of the many validates everything the few are doing. Ignorance represents ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable); which under natural law (balance) has consequences (imbalance).
VER'BALLY, adverb - "in words spoken; by words uttered"...the suggestion of uttered words represents ones claim upon perceivable sound, hence the ignorant weakness which tempts parasitic consequences.
Perceivable nature doesn't utter words; words are shaped by choice out of perceivable sound and then suggested as contract law towards the consenting choice of others.