On the first day of spring and fall the flat earth crowd believes the sun travels over the equator. The heading of the sunrise at Portland, Maine is due East. The simultaneous heading of the sunrise in Santiago, Chile which is South of the equator (but also at 70 West longitude) is also due East. These facts are indisputable. So either we have two suns or the sun is millions of miles away. If the sun is far away then a flat earth would have sunshine 24 hours a day.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I am often north of Lat 60 for work at night in the winter and you can watch the glow of the sun after sunset circle to north, then eastward and finally rising again in the west. I have photos of corpuscular rays that would blow your mind. I hated flattards, then I listened for a bit, then I looked around. Antarctica is a 360 ice wall bro.
Thats how we all changed. As soon as I quieted down and actually took the time to consider their points instead of instantly trying to deboonk I realized.... it really is flat. Living on the coast helps, too.
Or the sun travels in a circular path, where those in Portland are inside the circle, while those in Chile are outside the circular path of the sun.
As sunlight travels over an distance, the wavelengths gets shorter and shorter. Once the wavelength gets small enough, light goes from being in the visible spectrum to being ultra violet, and to our naked eyes the sky will appear darker, until it is all black, as we no longer are able to see any visible light.
"Or the sun travels in a circular path"
Or?.. so you're not sure?... But I mean we can all go an observe the phenomenon if it were true... And yet here we are?
C'mon guys...
You yourself could always travel to the North Pole next summer and experience midnight sun for a couple of weeks. That is when the sun never goes below the horizon, so you can observe the sun a round the clock, while it makes a circular path in the sky. Every hour, make a mark where the sun is in the sky, after 24 hours, make a line through all the marks, and you will see that you made a circle
Been there done that while banging tin for over a month in NWT.. to simply put it.. earth rotates on an axis and the north pole is angled towards the sun.
The good old 66.6 degree angel towards the sun.
Am I wrong?
I believe that you think that the earth is rotating, and that is what causes the sun to go in a circular path. It is irrelevant to the Flat Earth model though.
But I mean... I can sit here and say you believe the earth is flat when it's actually rotating.
How come after all these years we have no Aerial view pricing earth is some sort of flat disk of some sort...also that would mean continents would actually be where they are.. wheres some good 4k shots of this or the so called ice wall surrounding us.
Tides.
Uh, those are caused by The Great Turtle exhaling. Now ask me about babies and storks.
I tried reading this comment twice and went cross-eyed both times. Thanks.
So the moon effects tides of the ocean but not lakes?
Can you think of any reason at all why the moons gravitational pull might be more observable on the ocean than a lake? Just think hard for a minute. But no rush.
Yea less water to displace does not have anything to do with globe or FE.
Your question had to do with tides bud. It's OK though. I wish you well.
lmao please dont tell me you're ACTUALLY that little fucking jew
wewwwwwwwwwww
edit: for refrence
https://files.catbox.moe/5py4zh.png
Just like any group there are people in the FE community that are intentionally misguiding. No one in FE really knows what the model is. Globies just pick the wacky models to argue how stupid FE is. Look up Nathan Oakley. He now has become repetitive after the 100 episode. If you listen to his newest you will here them doing devils advocate stuff but they cover all these points. No one from globe earth debate there. Couple things he brings up.
Any proof of axial rotation. How do you find the R value of the planet Any real evidence of gravitational waves Evidence of curvature/bulge of the earth Can gas or even a vacuum exist without a container What is the distance to the sun
Simple math tells you that you have to use the formula of a triangle to measure distance it wouldnt work on a globe, and scientists for some reason measure using a triangle then transform it into a curve. Why would you do this if you could measure the curve. Even a sexton uses a flat angle. Their calculation of R value is from the center of the earth not on the surface of the globe earth.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BUSxkhWnpXk This lady even states that she assumes that the earth is curved to measure a mountain then says we are close enough to the earth that we can measure a mountain using a flat angel. 1ft ht is 1.1mile distance. Between that measurement you should still be able to measure a curve but scientists dont include this in their calculations. They just use the triangle formula. Dont remember learning that triangles have a curve in them.
No they dont. Globers use the FE model when explaining to FErs how stupid their FE model is. Why would they use the globe to the FErs to show how stupid their FE model is when FErs dont believe the earth is a globe. Also the FE model is not universally agreed upon. Some believe there are more land masses outside of that ice wall and others dont care about the model but in basic observable facts such as any evidence of the distance to the sun. Any sign of an axial rotation of the earth based variety. Any evidence of a molten core at the center of a presupposed earth. Scientific evidence of gravity. Gas pressure without a container. Any sign of earth curve or geometric horizon. Radius value.
How do you figure? I don’t think many would argue with your “indisputable facts”, but why can’t the one sun (wether millions or a few thousand miles away) rise from the east in both locations? A picture might help to explain your reasoning / conception.
Strawman. Yawn.
Sarcasm is the mark of the cultist.