a) to be implies as "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom.
b) the few suggest "we" (togetherness) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being "one" (apartheid) aka partial (choice) within whole (balance).
c) SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.]...it's perceivable balance which sets choice...not the suggesting choices of others and their systems of control. Consenting to the suggestions of others shirks control over self onto others.
a) to be implies as "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom.
b) the few suggest "we" (togetherness) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being "one" (apartheid) aka partial (choice) within whole (balance).
c) SYS'TEM, noun [Latin systema; Gr. to set.]...it's perceivable balance which sets choice...not the suggesting choices of others and their systems of control. Consenting to the suggestions of others shirks control over self onto others.