Can someone explain the Q conspiracy theory to me, and provide me with reasonable evidence to the theory's credibility? How did it start? As a conservative, I never believed Q and rarely thought about it, not even knowing what most of it was. What is the best evidence supporting this conspiracy theory, if any?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Q is supposedly a military operation to end the deep state. Trump is part of it. Q posts talk about conspiracies, and say many things we agree with but also claims there is a plan to stop it. Trump has done many things that seem to suggest he is in on Q and supports it. Q is pretty clearly a high level operation done by big players. The question is are those players actually out for our best interest, or is it a nefarious plan. Is Q there to sedate right wingers into inaction, make them think there's already someone handling these problems? Or is Q a way to galvanize Patriots and let us know we have friendlies in high government and military positions? This board mostly says it's the former, as well as PDW.
>The question is are those players actually out for our best interest, or is it a nefarious plan.
Too many decent Americans have been and are being, allowed to die due to the covid/vax bullshit. The social fabric of the U.S. and almost every other country has been terribly frayed by the plandemic lockdowns and economic harms/stresses. I don't believe genuinely patriotic insiders at the level of power of those who supposedly made up Q would allow to happen what we've seen over the past few years.
I can see it as basically an intelligence counterattack to Communist subversion/demoralization. Yuri said the only way to defeat the Communist plan is if the target country develops strong patriotism and defends it's own values. I feel like Q giving people hope is not such a bad thing. I believe "conspiracy theorists" were too demoralized and in the closet prior to Trump. Q was like a Coach telling his team who are losing big at halftime, "we can still win this. In fact we ARE winning. We have them right where we want them!" Even if it's not entirely true, 'the team' needed motivation. Now, they're fired up and actually believe they can win, which is essential if you plan on actually winning.
I can just as easily describe scenarios where Q would be a horrific psy-op that will destroy all of its followers in the end. I am not saying I believe Q was created by good or bad actors. But I still feel like both explanations remain visible to some degree of another.