c'mon, bro. If we are moving through space at approx 1 million miles per hour in some random direction, and every other star is also moving at some ridiculous speed in some other random direction, how long would it take to see a shift in the stars? A few months? A few days?? Our star charts have never changed since the beginning of recorded history. The same star maps we used in the 1700's we can pickup and use today. We know we've been lied to about almost everything in history by every government (and other entity) in history, but this topic is just one hurdle people cannot seem to believe they are currently still being lied to about.
The stars are way far apart and it really takes a lot of time to make an appreciable change in patterns. It's not like planets orbiting the sun. Stars are so far apart it takes light (photons) years to go between them; that's a long long distance. Even if they are moving fast, the subtended angle of arc change is very small at the distances we are from them. So the patterns really don't change quickly.
What??? It's well known in astronomy that constellations change over time as the stars move. It just takes a long time. Space is vast.
c'mon, bro. If we are moving through space at approx 1 million miles per hour in some random direction, and every other star is also moving at some ridiculous speed in some other random direction, how long would it take to see a shift in the stars? A few months? A few days?? Our star charts have never changed since the beginning of recorded history. The same star maps we used in the 1700's we can pickup and use today. We know we've been lied to about almost everything in history by every government (and other entity) in history, but this topic is just one hurdle people cannot seem to believe they are currently still being lied to about.
The stars are way far apart and it really takes a lot of time to make an appreciable change in patterns. It's not like planets orbiting the sun. Stars are so far apart it takes light (photons) years to go between them; that's a long long distance. Even if they are moving fast, the subtended angle of arc change is very small at the distances we are from them. So the patterns really don't change quickly.
You're not understanding the distances involved. If you don't understand the argument you're trying to debunk, nothing you say will be relevant.