This video is inside baseball, so I'll provide you with a context:
William F. Bengston (aka Bill Bengston) has found a way to teach almost anyone a simple "healing method" that works really well
The "Bengston Method" Has been tested over 14 times on the most tested mouse cancer model in the world. Cure rate is c. 95%. Mice are cured from a known, and otherwise 100% lethal mammarian cancer. The cured mice are IMMUNE to further cancers (for life). They live a healthy and normal lifespan after the cure
The method is simple , anybody can learn it. It doesn't require belief, crystals, religion, ceremony, but is fairly tedious to learn (imagery rotation really fast in your mind). Instructions and self-learning is in this audio book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1591799147
The method doesn't only work on mice and cancers, but a variety of illnesses. It does NOT cure everybody and everything.
Basic findings are: the less ego you are (the more playful you are) as a healer - the better it works. The more NEED the healee has, the better it works. The worse the condition treated, usually the more responsive and dramatic the cure. Long term conditions (i.e. crippled for 15 years) are harder to cure than aggressive new cancers. Simple things (like warts) can NOT be cured.
It works on people, I personally know several people who have taught this method themselves and cured themselves and several of their clients (two of them are PhD physicists).
I've personally experienced this healing myself.
The healing methods has been studied in 6 academic institutions over dozens times and the results are always the same (in randomized, blind, placebo "healing") controlled tests): it works. The Universities can't handle this result and always require a retest. The retest always comes out the same: it works. Then university labs lose interest - "if we go with this, we lose funding..."
It was not scalable originally, as there is much more people needing healing than there are people willing to learn and do daily healing using the method
However, it is totally non-local: healer and healee do NOT need to be in the same place for the healing to work. Also, group healing seems to work powerfully as well: the more healees there are in the group (even if being worked by a single healer), the better it seems to work.
However the scalability was still an issue for Bill Bengston, so he wanted to scale it and store it, so it could be sent (imagine $1/healing , not a $100 healing session).
Bengston tried storing healing (from healers) in cotton (works well, but is not scalable), as a recording (EM/torsion/light/audio/etc) which also works (but not as well as the actual healing, but is easily copiable).... and now water : stores healing really well and can be scaled (you can dilute the water, and the more your dilute it, the better the water works).
He's in the process of publishing all this, including academic papers (including test data) and the instructions how to do water storage and dilution. Stay tuned.
Practitioners who have learned his healing method have also stored healing in nickel, copper, brass, etc.
The healing can "jump" (resonate) from one group to another. So there's that too, if there are people being healed with similar symptoms next to the healee, that the healer knows about, the healing can "resonate" (i..e positively affect those other people as well).
As a bonus: once you do the method as a healer (basically rotate a list of things in your mind as image of things you most truly want for yourself), then magic happens: you start getting these things in your life. Yes. I shit you not. I'm a scientist, I've been in academic institutions, I've published. I don't say this lightly. This is not new age woo-woo. I've seen this happen to people. And no, it doesn't help you to win the lottery (read the book to find out why).
So:
you don't need drugs
you don't need to believe in it (i..e placebo effect)
you don't need to pay through your nose
you don't need to find a special healer with a special skills, once the scaling into water is done and starts get produced
you don't need to rely on ANYBODY, you can get off your lazy ass and learn this yourself (you can even find a copy of the audio book, if you search, you don't even have to buy it).
The conspiracy part?
An Ivy League university wanted to hire Bill Bengston , give him a lab and a few millions and bury him for 10 years doing replications (he's already done 14 the last time I checked). Bill told that university to "go fuck themselves".
So yes, healing is real. It is being supressed.
Now you know and you can do something about it.
It's up to you.
And you don't have to believe in it or NOT believe in it. All you need to do is test it (be a real scientist, and not a debunker).
Reiki practitioner myself and agree. For me, this one was more potent and yes I agree, most (if not all) healing systems stem from/point to the same direction. Use whatever works.
The thing I find interesting in Bill's latest application is STORING AND MASS PRODUCING the healing, i. e. not being tied to specific healer anymore.
This video is inside baseball, so I'll provide you with a context:
William F. Bengston (aka Bill Bengston) has found a way to teach almost anyone a simple "healing method" that works really well
The "Bengston Method" Has been tested over 14 times on the most tested mouse cancer model in the world. Cure rate is c. 95%. Mice are cured from a known, and otherwise 100% lethal mammarian cancer. The cured mice are IMMUNE to further cancers (for life). They live a healthy and normal lifespan after the cure
The method is simple , anybody can learn it. It doesn't require belief, crystals, religion, ceremony, but is fairly tedious to learn (imagery rotation really fast in your mind). Instructions and self-learning is in this audio book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1591799147
The method doesn't only work on mice and cancers, but a variety of illnesses. It does NOT cure everybody and everything.
Basic findings are: the less ego you are (the more playful you are) as a healer - the better it works. The more NEED the healee has, the better it works. The worse the condition treated, usually the more responsive and dramatic the cure. Long term conditions (i.e. crippled for 15 years) are harder to cure than aggressive new cancers. Simple things (like warts) can NOT be cured.
It works on people, I personally know several people who have taught this method themselves and cured themselves and several of their clients (two of them are PhD physicists).
I've personally experienced this healing myself.
The healing methods has been studied in 6 academic institutions over dozens times and the results are always the same (in randomized, blind, placebo "healing") controlled tests): it works. The Universities can't handle this result and always require a retest. The retest always comes out the same: it works. Then university labs lose interest - "if we go with this, we lose funding..."
It was not scalable originally, as there is much more people needing healing than there are people willing to learn and do daily healing using the method
However, it is totally non-local: healer and healee do NOT need to be in the same place for the healing to work. Also, group healing seems to work powerfully as well: the more healees there are in the group (even if being worked by a single healer), the better it seems to work.
However the scalability was still an issue for Bill Bengston, so he wanted to scale it and store it, so it could be sent (imagine $1/healing , not a $100 healing session).
Bengston tried storing healing (from healers) in cotton (works well, but is not scalable), as a recording (EM/torsion/light/audio/etc) which also works (but not as well as the actual healing, but is easily copiable).... and now water : stores healing really well and can be scaled (you can dilute the water, and the more your dilute it, the better the water works).
He's in the process of publishing all this, including academic papers (including test data) and the instructions how to do water storage and dilution. Stay tuned.
Practitioners who have learned his healing method have also stored healing in nickel, copper, brass, etc.
The healing can "jump" (resonate) from one group to another. So there's that too, if there are people being healed with similar symptoms next to the healee, that the healer knows about, the healing can "resonate" (i..e positively affect those other people as well).
As a bonus: once you do the method as a healer (basically rotate a list of things in your mind as image of things you most truly want for yourself), then magic happens: you start getting these things in your life. Yes. I shit you not. I'm a scientist, I've been in academic institutions, I've published. I don't say this lightly. This is not new age woo-woo. I've seen this happen to people. And no, it doesn't help you to win the lottery (read the book to find out why).
So:
The conspiracy part?
An Ivy League university wanted to hire Bill Bengston , give him a lab and a few millions and bury him for 10 years doing replications (he's already done 14 the last time I checked). Bill told that university to "go fuck themselves".
So yes, healing is real. It is being supressed.
Now you know and you can do something about it.
It's up to you.
And you don't have to believe in it or NOT believe in it. All you need to do is test it (be a real scientist, and not a debunker).
Dude as a Reiki healer myself this thing works.
However prevention is key.
Heal yourself every day so you don't get shit. If you do it is hard to reverse plus you probably need someone else to the healing for you.
Never heard of this guy but hands on energy healing is probably the same across all techniques.
No need for faith in it. You see the results and know it works
Reiki practitioner myself and agree. For me, this one was more potent and yes I agree, most (if not all) healing systems stem from/point to the same direction. Use whatever works.
The thing I find interesting in Bill's latest application is STORING AND MASS PRODUCING the healing, i. e. not being tied to specific healer anymore.
So best method for me to learn?
CD, book, or something else?