Well, I am not about to flip over to the flat earth acceptance based on what I have so far, that much is clear.
I am still looking for what it is that has convinced you, we have the three points and for me they are not concrete, they are subjective.
Each of the three points can be explained as a lack of understanding / information from either side. In order to calculate curvature we would need to know the exact dimensions of the planet, this is not a known, it is estimated.
To ascertain the behavior of a given star group, we are required to have all the surrounding understandings at 100% to draw any conclusions. Again we only have some assumptions we have made to date.
I have been studying plasma cosmology and so far it leaves very few questions for me. So, it by far outshines all the other ideas.
For me, flat earth is a really old idea and there is nothing I have found that suggests it is the state of things.
I would be more inclined to accept toroidial earth given the current state of information :)
Orbit velocity claims just do not seem to hold any water, if we want to make such suggestions we need to get out into space and start examining how this stuff works.
This is all just useless conjecture for a few reasons.
One reason, is you are arguing using physics models that have formed the basis of our understanding yet you reject the overall understanding.
Our current understanding of magnetism and electricity in the universe is albeit in it's stages of infancy, but when you want to instead suggest that theories from thousands of years ago are more relevant I beg to differ.
Your observations are subjective simply because they are from your viewpoint using your understanding, you seem to think you have it all figured out and all your reasoning has proven to you that the claims are real. When in reality you have misunderstood what you see and also what you should expect to see. I am not the first person to point this out either, so simply review what all the other people who do not accept the claim of how the orbit works with respect to our visible star groups.
Regarding velocity. When you want to insert the laws declared long ago with such a minimal understanding of related inputs, surely you can expect nothing but random back. Garbage in, Garbage out.
Rest assured that if any of the flat earth ideas you have put forth so far were able to be proven as such, then the proof would be clear, more evidence to the fact it is subjective analysis.
Well, I am not about to flip over to the flat earth acceptance based on what I have so far, that much is clear.
I am still looking for what it is that has convinced you, we have the three points and for me they are not concrete, they are subjective.
Each of the three points can be explained as a lack of understanding / information from either side. In order to calculate curvature we would need to know the exact dimensions of the planet, this is not a known, it is estimated.
To ascertain the behavior of a given star group, we are required to have all the surrounding understandings at 100% to draw any conclusions. Again we only have some assumptions we have made to date.
I have been studying plasma cosmology and so far it leaves very few questions for me. So, it by far outshines all the other ideas.
For me, flat earth is a really old idea and there is nothing I have found that suggests it is the state of things.
I would be more inclined to accept toroidial earth given the current state of information :)
Orbit velocity claims just do not seem to hold any water, if we want to make such suggestions we need to get out into space and start examining how this stuff works.
This is all just useless conjecture for a few reasons.
One reason, is you are arguing using physics models that have formed the basis of our understanding yet you reject the overall understanding.
Our current understanding of magnetism and electricity in the universe is albeit in it's stages of infancy, but when you want to instead suggest that theories from thousands of years ago are more relevant I beg to differ.
Your observations are subjective simply because they are from your viewpoint using your understanding, you seem to think you have it all figured out and all your reasoning has proven to you that the claims are real. When in reality you have misunderstood what you see and also what you should expect to see. I am not the first person to point this out either, so simply review what all the other people who do not accept the claim of how the orbit works with respect to our visible star groups.
Regarding velocity. When you want to insert the laws declared long ago with such a minimal understanding of related inputs, surely you can expect nothing but random back. Garbage in, Garbage out.
Rest assured that if any of the flat earth ideas you have put forth so far were able to be proven as such, then the proof would be clear, more evidence to the fact it is subjective analysis.