I see constant, verifiable bits of evidence that disprove each model, yet I see a constant stream of diatribes from each side… sound familiar? Divide and conquer. It's possible that both models are false, completely.
Nobody can deny the fake footage from the ISS, the absolutely fake moon landing, the fake Tesla Roadster in space, the lasers across 20 mile stretches, the zoom ends on boats that should be completely behind the horizon, etc.
And then on the flipside, nobody can deny things like the celestial poles (a post today), the ability to grab a telescope in view another planet, etc.
It's possible we are in a physical simulation of some kind. I think pretending that we know the answer for sure, one way or another, based on bullshit and lies fed to us by the television is just a LARP.
Thoughts?
I agree the curve is not present, at least not in the hundreds of experiments I've seen. But there are also some things we can't explain, like the stars circling above when near Antarctica, etc. I just want to know how we can rectify both of these things in the same model.
Interesting, thanks. What it appears that he is illustrating is actually pretty intuitive, but I couldn't really hear anything he was saying because the audio sounded like it was being filmed in a waterfall. I think maybe that was a reupload of the original.
I wouldn't call myself a Normie. I don't even have a TV. I've consumed basically nothing but conspiracy content since the mid-2000s, and flat earth content since 2010-ish. I've watched every video from taboo conspiracy and even watch the controlled ops like Jeranism, etc. I just can't hear the audio in this video because it sounds like somebody ran it through some kind of filter to make a bunch of white noise over top the voice. Skip a few minutes into the video when he starts doing the demo on his modeling software. You'll hear it.