Northern celestial pole time-lapse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lV8PVzPZcBk

Southern celestial pole time-lapse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w3n-s9i7WQ

Equator celestial time-lapse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPtVG_pVNHI

The existence of 2, and only 2, celestial poles, that are always consistently revolving around the same points regardless of viewing point on Earth, disproves the flat Earth theory.

Anyone with a smartphone or time-lapse camera can test and duplicate the results.

I looked into FE and found a huge flaw. One I haven’t seen a good explanation for. The closest thing to an explanation I was presented is “perspective makes it look that way.” The problem with that explanation is, the southern celestial pole wouldn’t consistently revolve around the same point if that was the case. The southern celestial pole ALWAYS revolves around the same point REGARDLESS of perspective.

As far as other problems that may or may not be with any other theories, that is another debate. My infographic demonstrates that 2 celestial poles do not fit into the flat Earth theory.

If you care to present another explanation as to how “2, and only 2, celestial poles, that are always consistently revolving around the same points regardless of viewing point on Earth,” could fit into the flat Earth model, I am VERY interested in hearing it.

A secondary thing to explain to me, why is the Equator the only place on Earth where you can see both spirals?

)))III((( <- like this