The NIH approves Ivermectin in their new guidelines without telling us they now approve Ivermectin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Do you have a good link?
National Institute of Health website.
The NIH says not to use Ivermectin:
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antiviral-therapy/ivermectin/
For the record, I strongly disagree with the NIH, based on the countless studies available, but I don't see any indication that the NIH has changed their stance and is now recommending Ivermectin.
This is only slightly on point.
But I did some reading about ivermectin recently. Honestly, didnt care enough to read about it before. But all the banning certainly is strange.
It's funny that people "haha horse paste" because Ivermectin is derived from a single cell organism, much like penicillin if I understand correctly.
Discovered in some soil in japan, which is funny because ive also heard about some super antibiotic type stuff discovered recently in the north americas https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2018/02/20/powerful-antibiotics-found-in-dirt/
Ivermectin has been tested for decades on the poor because of how cheap it is to produce and its safety. It is known as a poor mans drug, because many people in these third world countries take it as a pre-emptive way to ward off parasites and the diseases they bring.
But yet it is so dangerous, that if you try to order it in Canada, that border agents will confiscate it and doctors are banned from prescribing it.
I just want to try it because it is supposedly effective against chronic ear infections. It would be easier to get heroin.
Interesting, I did not know it came from an organic source like that.
I bought a bunch of the apple horse paste in early 2020 and, after testing it for safety on myself, gave it to my friends and family and warned all them, essentially, "I don't know if this will work as well as I think it will, but the hospital will kill you; on purpose."