Let’s say a 70 year pattern, fastest mode of travel:
- 1800: Horse*
- 1870: Locomotive
- 1940: Rocket
- 2010: Still rocket …
WTF happened? I have my suspicions, but I need to shore up my information when discussing with sheep.
*I know steam engines were around, but not widespread.
I agree that they make us believe we’re somehow ‘super advanced’ when the opposite is true. Prevents us from digging into the past to learn that out ancient ancestors were more advanced than us.
From what I’ve gathered, our ancient ancestors were basically the Jetsons, and we’re the Flintstones …
Details surrounding Stonehenge, the Pyramids, “Sacred Geometry”, etc show that our ancestors had access to technology we either haven’t discovered or only recently invented.
Stonehenge is fake and gay. It never existed as what it is today. Many of its stones have been added recently within the last century, and became restructured into a fable. The fable that Britain had a better Neolithic culture than Ireland. When in fact it grave robbed it. I mean even Scotland has better ruins. Romans really hated Brits. But for almost the last 1000 years it was known as Roman ruins. Suddenly it got turned into this other monument when in fact it simply didn't exist like it does now. It was never an ancient Calendar marking the solstices.
Tell me why there are no other Celt monuments of note, apart from the remains of ancient hillforts. But out of the blue unlike the Irish mounds and the others in France there's this British sore thumb? Because Romans forgot about it? I mean look what they did to Jerusalem and Alexandria. But they left the most popular Druidic culture site in history still vaguely standing? No chance. Ireland they didn't reach like the tips of Scotland but even then the stone circle up there is another fake. Where the stones came from is Wales, and they arrived by train.
Those Irish burial mounds are something else if you want to look at that history. Very similar to ones found in ancient Turkey. But absolutely unique. Again in France has similar. Britain however was quite sacked, Romans uprooted culture severely, like the Island of the Driuds.
Of course Britain has ancient sites one they don't like mentioning is the South of England was heavily cultivated, evidence of this goes back almost 10,000 years. Fields of repeated agriculture hardly fit the Cheddarman, Neanderthal theme. But it's there. So are the early copper, tin traderoutes.
Who constructed Stonehenge then, with GPS accuracy we didn't acquire until the 1990's? The quarry, monument and an associated structure (forgot the name) form a perfect 5/12 triangle miles in length. This is just one example of intra- and inter-continent alignment with precise GPS coordinates - constructed well before the 1990's.
The great tomb inside the Giza pyramid has GPS coordinates that are precisely the speed of light.
There are what appear to be nano machines found several feet underneath a lake in Russia.
We still don't understand how some of the Romans; technology, like certain aqueducts, worked.
Why is this so? None of this raises any skepticism about textbook history?
It was known as Roman ruins all the way until the late 1700s. When the druid society partied on it.
Modern humans constructed Stonehenge. They added a bunch of stones and have been doing so increasingly. They put them into a supposed alignment. So Britain became the authority on ancient astrological alignment. It has the best preserved monument marking it. The others in Egypt are not to the same scale. There is Turkey today. But nobody knew about Gobekli Tepe then. They still don't. It has yet to be fully inserted.
The stones were a ruin. No particular order or function, just stones with like a single arch, majority fallen over, in larger heaps, with like another standing. I can show you how castles and towers degrade if you want. Suddenly our oldest castles are a Stonehenge. I mean seriously the last thing to go is the structural arch and lintel. The stones from Wales have been increasingly added.
The next biggest question are why are no other stone circles in the area. Scotland you say, another fake. Wales possibly, but more conjecture. Where on the continent, nearby, who it had a history with, fields of agriculture and the copper and tin trade. Ireland the burial mounds similar to France and all the way to Turkey. Suddenly like a very sore thumb Britain is the primordial authority on ancient astrology. Because the druids demanded it.
Forget about it. It's very fake. But not without merit. Because in the Mid East there are stone circles. Nothing like Stonehenge at all. Nope, it's complete bullshit. Everytime look at that. Look at the first World Wonder on all those computer games and shit. Stonehenge it's older than Pyramids. Hahahaha.
There are presumably a few other but it's for the narrative of how the primates advanced. They started as monkeys, then they became domesticated, herders, while staring at the sky they sooner invented religion building mounds and marking the stars. Presto they're constructing the pyramids next. A narrative needs its history. Look at Stonehenge. There you have it. We can claim every other ruin is a star chart. Like Bulgaria, Eastern Europe, and all those other Mid East glyphs. Because I mean it's what the pyramid builders did. They built circles first.