In nature, creatures breed more of their kind. Homosexuals when they do reproduce do not inherently create more of their kind. Also the main purpose of their having sex is self-release, only, and not breeding. Also, anal sex and sodomy do not produce offspring.
I spoke of abnormality in reproduction, not about beer.
In this one I spoke of alien. You can't tell me that a drag queen is not something visually demonic and unnatural, a distorted and alien copy of femininity. Garish clownlike makeup is alien and when done badly invokes the image of demons, not of women.
There's a long history of experience by people encountering lesbians with man-hate and certainly man-disdain.
Not true. There are plenty of cases of married bis cheating on their mate. Plenty.
#s 1 through 5 speak of the deviation from the norm of homosexuality.
You forget that in nature, many animals commit homosexual acts, so it's not really unnatural if you're arguing from a Catholic position of Natural Law, or "nature".
Nature is horrid and disgusting. By our standards literally all of nature reproduces via pedophilia. Animals fuck as soon as they hit puberty. Only humans force ourselves to wait years. By arguing for nature you're arguing for pedophilia. Fucktard.
I will not, in a million years, accept homosexual anal sex as good and decent.
Anal sex isn't "good." Neither is vaginal sex for that matter. It's just sex. Though I would argue that if you are making your partner happy whether it's anal, vaginal, oral, or whatever, it's good because you are doing something good for a consenting adult partner. You would understand that if you weren't so full of hate and misery.
u/furriesrock Thoughts? It's always fun to fuck with the retards who argue "homosexuality isn't nAtUrAl."
The argument that homosexual sex isn't natural originates in the Catholic idea of Natural Law. According to Natural Law, all sex that isn't directly intended for the purpose of getting a woman pregnant is unnatural.
The false, Christian, idea of Natural Law is the only argument these fucktards have to attempt to justify their hatred of homosexuals, transgenders, non-conforming sexually deviant people, and etc...
If they didn't have the false idea of Natural Law to fall back on then they would have no argument.
Flaws in your notes:.
You forget that in nature, many animals commit homosexual acts, so it's not really unnatural if you're arguing from a Catholic position of Natural Law, or "nature".
Your defense of homosexual bullshit disgusts me. Next up, you want to defend pedos? Try it.
I will not, in a million years, accept homosexual anal sex as good and decent.
Oh, the old 'tar them as a Catholic" ploy. I'm not Catholic.
I don't share your values or your morals and I don't accept liberals pushing theirs on me. Woke can get fucked.
Nature is horrid and disgusting. By our standards literally all of nature reproduces via pedophilia. Animals fuck as soon as they hit puberty. Only humans force ourselves to wait years. By arguing for nature you're arguing for pedophilia. Fucktard.
Anal sex isn't "good." Neither is vaginal sex for that matter. It's just sex. Though I would argue that if you are making your partner happy whether it's anal, vaginal, oral, or whatever, it's good because you are doing something good for a consenting adult partner. You would understand that if you weren't so full of hate and misery.
u/furriesrock Thoughts? It's always fun to fuck with the retards who argue "homosexuality isn't nAtUrAl."
"By our standards literally all of nature reproduces via pedophilia."
Oh look, a Disney about to justify that buttfucking kids is also good sex. Go pick those Cheetoes crumbs out of your greasy unwashed beard.
The argument that homosexual sex isn't natural originates in the Catholic idea of Natural Law. According to Natural Law, all sex that isn't directly intended for the purpose of getting a woman pregnant is unnatural.
The false, Christian, idea of Natural Law is the only argument these fucktards have to attempt to justify their hatred of homosexuals, transgenders, non-conforming sexually deviant people, and etc...
If they didn't have the false idea of Natural Law to fall back on then they would have no argument.
So, now that I've proven your argument based on nature is wrong, you're just getting angry.
In your case, I can see that felching kills brain cells. lol. You proved nothing.