Ss: i dont know who is the main culprit behind all the terrible woke stuff. But shareblue and david brock havent turned anyone blue. And larry fink and blackrock are shitty investors.
Heres why: Shareblue didnt turned anyone blue. What they did was make former blue people who are easily influenced "extreme blue." And they scared off all moderate people with their censorship and bots. So creating extreme blue people that already were gonna vote blue and turning everyone else off is a net negative. Millions or more wasted to decrease blue votes.
As for fink it blackrock. This guy probably has a huge ego thinking hes a good investor. But in reality he has tanked so many companies with his woke stuff. The only reason hes good is he has power from the 2008 crisis and the gov helping him. Now they are so rich even if he makes companies he owns worth less he can still get rich off it since hes basically in cheat mode at this point.
This is more surface level stuff obviously their are deeper levels with freemason illuminati whatever.
But just saying they spent endless printed money to be not effective. Unless they just want people to fight.
I agree with your analysis, especially as concerns Shareblue. There are many other examples of such, like the J6 hearings. Is there one single person in the US who had no opinion on the events that day, then tuned in for a few hours and thought, "OMG, it really was worse than Pearl Harbor!" No way. And it turned out even the early rating were half what they were for the regular evening newscasts they preempted. That is, half of normie newswatchers literally turned it off.
I would go the next step and say that this all indicates we're in the endgame. Who pursues an agenda without worrying about losing adherents to it? One that knows control is slipping away and if they don't score a "war decisive" victory soon, they never will.
> david (((brock)))
> larry (((fink)))
> "freemasons"