So there's different satellites and the images we see are essentially comprised of many images stitched together. They prioritize the satellites with higher temporal and spatial resolution over areas of increased interest.
No you totally ignored what i said just to be contrarian. We're saying the same thing. They prioritize taking images over areas of interest which means more frames 🤦♂️
So there's different satellites and the images we see are essentially comprised of many images stitched together. They prioritize the satellites with higher temporal and spatial resolution over areas of increased interest.
It works exactly backwards from that: more frames of reference = higher fidelity; not less.
No you totally ignored what i said just to be contrarian. We're saying the same thing. They prioritize taking images over areas of interest which means more frames 🤦♂️
You’re probably exactly right. I can’t make sense of my reply after reading it again.
Your assessment is right, I just don’t think that’s the “why” the images over the poles are shit.