Not to discredit that list, because certain things in there are definitive proven things, but most of these sources include msm sites we know to be propaganda machines themselves.
Granted, this (and other examples in that list) may be those rare oddities that actually tell the truth for once, but I sure as heck am not trusting sites like the nytimes and the like given their track record.
Not to discredit that list, because certain things in there are definitive proven things, but most of these sources include msm sites we know to be propaganda machines themselves.
It's no surprise media like the guardian would make yet another article about "orangeman bad." https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jan/24/trump-administration-wildfire-science-promote-logging-california-emissions
What professional wording this article has: https://www.vice.com/en/article/3bpxek/coloring-the-black-panthers
Granted, this (and other examples in that list) may be those rare oddities that actually tell the truth for once, but I sure as heck am not trusting sites like the nytimes and the like given their track record.