Everything you mentioned, especially industrial food, is an artificial problem with better solutions already known. You citing these things actually proves my point about only being overpopulated by metric of maintaining the status quo.
Industrial food production is inefficient. It produces very few vitamins, minerals and calories per square ft. Inefficient production(& distribution) =/= lack of resources.
Lmao; cities over 15k? and your solution is depopulation? Do you recommend post-birth abortion as a solution to a family of 5 not fitting in a Lambo too? Over-density =/= over-population.
We are only overpopulated by metrics of the ruling class and their ability to maintain their status quo.
I've worked in food desert mitigation and non-government affordable housing for over a decade. Why do you assume that the only thing possible to change is global population?
I could continue with examples of overpopulation even more horrific
No, you couldn't. You didn't. Why wouldn't you lead with your most horrific examples?
"So to prove my point, here's the worst evidence I have, in fact it isn't really evidence or proof of anything at all really... but they are some things, not even mentioning all the good evidence I have which does in fact prove my point."
Everything you mentioned, especially industrial food, is an artificial problem with better solutions already known. You citing these things actually proves my point about only being overpopulated by metric of maintaining the status quo.
Industrial food production is inefficient. It produces very few vitamins, minerals and calories per square ft. Inefficient production(& distribution) =/= lack of resources.
Lmao; cities over 15k? and your solution is depopulation? Do you recommend post-birth abortion as a solution to a family of 5 not fitting in a Lambo too? Over-density =/= over-population.
We are only overpopulated by metrics of the ruling class and their ability to maintain their status quo.
I've worked in food desert mitigation and non-government affordable housing for over a decade. Why do you assume that the only thing possible to change is global population?
No, you couldn't. You didn't. Why wouldn't you lead with your most horrific examples?
Why would that be necessary?
"So to prove my point, here's the worst evidence I have, in fact it isn't really evidence or proof of anything at all really... but they are some things, not even mentioning all the good evidence I have which does in fact prove my point."
The worst evidence I have is already overwhelming. You're simply adding to it.