The debate over Prescott Bush's behaviour has been bubbling under the surface for some time. There has been a steady internet chatter about the "Bush/Nazi" connection, much of it inaccurate and unfair. But the new documents, many of which were only declassified last year, show that even after America had entered the war and when there was already significant information about the Nazis' plans and policies, he worked for and profited from companies closely involved with the very German businesses that financed Hitler's rise to power.
While there is no suggestion that Prescott Bush was sympathetic to the Nazi cause, the documents reveal that the firm he worked for, Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s before falling out with him at the end of the decade. The Guardian has seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen's US interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered the war.
Three sets of archives spell out Prescott Bush's involvement. All three are readily available, thanks to the efficient US archive system and a helpful and dedicated staff at both the Library of Congress in Washington and the National Archives at the University of Maryland.
The first set of files, the Harriman papers in the Library of Congress, show that Prescott Bush was a director and shareholder of a number of companies involved with Thyssen.
The second set of papers, which are in the National Archives, are contained in vesting order number 248 which records the seizure of the company assets. What these files show is that on October 20 1942 the alien property custodian seized the assets of the UBC, of which Prescott Bush was a director. Having gone through the books of the bank, further seizures were made against two affiliates, the Holland-American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation. By November, the Silesian-American Company, another of Prescott Bush's ventures, had also been seized.
The third set of documents, also at the National Archives, are contained in the files on IG Farben, who was prosecuted for war crimes.
Is it a stretch to think the vatican was involved? Proably not considering they have just as much political power as any nation state in that region of the world. Id say there wasnt much happening that the pope wasnt letting him slide with.
“On the big question, it’s clear: Pius XII never publicly criticised the Nazis for the mass murder they were committing of the Jews of Europe – and he knew from the very beginning that mass murder was taking place. Various clerics and others were pressing him to speak out, and he declined to do so.
“Although there is a lot of testimony showing that the church did protect Jews in Rome, when more than 1,000 were rounded up on 16 October 1943 and held for two days adjacent to the Vatican [before deportation to the death camps], Pius decided not to publicly protest or even privately send a plea to Hitler not to send them to their deaths in Auschwitz. Hopefully, what we’ll find from these archives is why he did what he did, and what discussions were going on behind the walls of the Vatican.”
Are you retarded? You made a claim about the Catholic Church being in cahoots with the Nazis and you attempted to back it up by saying, "this guy read some documents that nobody else can see."
Why in the flying fuck are you changing the subject to the Bush family?
Have you read the documents?
If so, can you please show me where I can read them?
why doesn't the article include a link to the documents?
Is it because if we got to read them, it would not support the completely unfounded theory that the Catholic Church was in cahoots with the Nazis?
How can someone who posts here take PBS seriously as a source?
Your kidding right lol. I am apt to believe it if PBS is airing it. They would have a hard time running it if it wasnt true.
You know about prescott bush's involvement with hitler right?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Is it a stretch to think the vatican was involved? Proably not considering they have just as much political power as any nation state in that region of the world. Id say there wasnt much happening that the pope wasnt letting him slide with.
Yeah, I think its plausible.
Are you retarded? You made a claim about the Catholic Church being in cahoots with the Nazis and you attempted to back it up by saying, "this guy read some documents that nobody else can see."
Why in the flying fuck are you changing the subject to the Bush family?