No one knows its shape. When I say "it's level/flat", I refer to its surface; I can't make any assertions about its actual shape other than "it can be anything that allows for a level surface".
Similarly, in regards to its thickness, no one (AFAIK) has ever dug a hole deeper than the Kola Superdeep, which reaches a depth of 7.61 miles (12.2 km). Wikipedia says they couldn't dig deeper...
Because of higher-than-expected temperatures at this depth and location, 180 °C (356 °F) instead of the expected 100 °C (212 °F), drilling deeper was deemed unfeasible. The unexpected decrease in density, the greater porosity, and the unexpectedly high temperatures caused the rock to behave somewhat like a plastic, making drilling nearly impossible.
Regarding the outer perimeter, it is postulated that what we call Earth is contained within a crater-like hole, which would explain how water could accumulate to form oceans. On the classic FE model, the outer rim is the "ice wall", which is actually Antarctica. Could very well be, given the restrictions surrounding free exploration of Antarctica. None of us know what lies deep beyond the rim.
I suggest you disregard any claims about its "shape" (remember shape vs. surface), because that's impossible to establish with the information we have. Moreover, it is one of the main talking points of the all-too-famous "flat earth" psyop.
yeah, it's fucking stupid, just like you. In a flat model, you would constantly have to be turning to get anywhere so flying from South America to Australia, for example, would take way more hours than it really does. The whole idea is retarded and not supported by anyone with any formal education. Your team is comprised of morons and idiots and no one smart. Your side can't explain anything properly without claiming 'illuminate' this or 'we're in a projection' or some other simpleton statement. Seriously, if you actually studied instead of watching YouTube for your facts, you might get it.
If the Earth is flat, how thick is it supposed to be? And is it a perfect rectangle?
No one knows its shape. When I say "it's level/flat", I refer to its surface; I can't make any assertions about its actual shape other than "it can be anything that allows for a level surface".
Similarly, in regards to its thickness, no one (AFAIK) has ever dug a hole deeper than the Kola Superdeep, which reaches a depth of 7.61 miles (12.2 km). Wikipedia says they couldn't dig deeper...
Regarding the outer perimeter, it is postulated that what we call Earth is contained within a crater-like hole, which would explain how water could accumulate to form oceans. On the classic FE model, the outer rim is the "ice wall", which is actually Antarctica. Could very well be, given the restrictions surrounding free exploration of Antarctica. None of us know what lies deep beyond the rim.
I suggest you disregard any claims about its "shape" (remember shape vs. surface), because that's impossible to establish with the information we have. Moreover, it is one of the main talking points of the all-too-famous "flat earth" psyop.
Oh right. Magellan and every ship and plane that has since circumnavigated the globe is all part of a grand psyop. Got it.
Sure, throw a red herring in there for good measure.
No, the globe has never been circumnavigated N/S, only E/W. Same thing applies to the classic FE model. Have you even looked at a map of it?
yeah, it's fucking stupid, just like you. In a flat model, you would constantly have to be turning to get anywhere so flying from South America to Australia, for example, would take way more hours than it really does. The whole idea is retarded and not supported by anyone with any formal education. Your team is comprised of morons and idiots and no one smart. Your side can't explain anything properly without claiming 'illuminate' this or 'we're in a projection' or some other simpleton statement. Seriously, if you actually studied instead of watching YouTube for your facts, you might get it.