My thing is, I've never seen any super high IQ people (who are also based and know many conspiracy theories are true) be flat earth.
You won't hear someone like Chris Langan believing that for example. He would suggest it's a very complex psyop to make our side look stupid.
I'm open to whatever, but I have way too many people much smarter than me who understand many conspiracies but say the Earth is round.
Either way, it would be nice if people on both sides didn't attack one another because some of us genuinely want to know the truth.
And at the end of the day, this topic ends up being one not worth spending much time on for me, as one would need to be a physicist to even begin to understand half the arguments on either side.
So for me, I'm round Earth, but anti-Copernican as that's the primary issue I think, making us feel as though we weren't the center of God's creation any longer made with purpose. For this topic, see Jonathan Pageau from the Symbolic World, he lines up where I am on all of it. - A Full Frontal Attack on The Copernican Revolution If all is relative, then the Earth most certainly could be considered the center of all Creation rather than the Sun. That to me, is the most important point, rather than the general shape.
Unless Chris Langan has specifically called FE a psyop, or you are Chris Langan yourself, then your claim that he would suggest FE is a psyop is simply your feelings in the absence of evidence to corroborate the feelings
Making claims based on zero evidence is what we're trying to avoid
Ask those much smarter persons that you "have" who say the Earth is round for their evidence of the round Earth
You'll find the attacks are almost unanimously one-sided when it comes to the FE debate
My thing is, I've never seen any super high IQ people (who are also based and know many conspiracy theories are true) be flat earth.
You won't hear someone like Chris Langan believing that for example. He would suggest it's a very complex psyop to make our side look stupid.
I'm open to whatever, but I have way too many people much smarter than me who understand many conspiracies but say the Earth is round.
Either way, it would be nice if people on both sides didn't attack one another because some of us genuinely want to know the truth.
And at the end of the day, this topic ends up being one not worth spending much time on for me, as one would need to be a physicist to even begin to understand half the arguments on either side.
So for me, I'm round Earth, but anti-Copernican as that's the primary issue I think, making us feel as though we weren't the center of God's creation any longer made with purpose. For this topic, see Jonathan Pageau from the Symbolic World, he lines up where I am on all of it. - A Full Frontal Attack on The Copernican Revolution If all is relative, then the Earth most certainly could be considered the center of all Creation rather than the Sun. That to me, is the most important point, rather than the general shape.
Unless Chris Langan has specifically called FE a psyop, or you are Chris Langan yourself, then your claim that he would suggest FE is a psyop is simply your feelings in the absence of evidence to corroborate the feelings
Making claims based on zero evidence is what we're trying to avoid
Ask those much smarter persons that you "have" who say the Earth is round for their evidence of the round Earth
You'll find the attacks are almost unanimously one-sided when it comes to the FE debate
https://communities.win/c/FlatEarth/p/141roCfDT4/resources/c
https://www.theflatearthpodcast.com/must-see-videos/