So let’s start off with some common ground. I’m sure most people will agree the moon revolves around earth. So with that in mind, how do you think it’s possible if the moon revolves around earth. That the sun is making the same path in the sky that the moon does? It’s the story of the tortoise and the hare. The moon is the tortoise it’s slower than the sun but yet it completes the ecliptic in one month. Winning the race. The sun takes a whole year to make the same path but flys across the sky faster than the moon. Our senses tell us we are stationary but we are told we are spinning and flying around the sun and we have to believe it on blind faith.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The framework is simple - the Earth revolves around the Sun, and the Moon revolves around the Earth, at a far closer distance. And the Earth also revolves around itself at a far greater speed than either the solar or the lunar rotational period. So, at least as far as day and night are concerned, it's not them spinning around us to begin with.
In turn, here's a question for disk believers:
For starters, I'm using what we can call the "standard" disk model, with the North Pole at the center and Antarctica on the edges of the disk.
Now, in order to account for the fact that it's always daytime somewhere on Earth, the Sun should effectively never set, and would not only have to hover in a somewhat circular pattern, but also work like a spotlight, only lighting a particular part of an otherwise flat surface. But in addition, that light would have to curve, in order to provide for the appearance of sunrises and sunsets at ground level, instead of, well, a giant spotlight in the sky. Which is a kind of behavior that's never been observed from any light source, even in the most extreme cases of cosmic gravitational lensing.
But wait, here's the real problem - lunar phases. Particularly the full moon and lunar eclipses. On some days, both the Sun and the Moon are visible in the sky, and the light side of the Moon is always turned toward the Sun, making the case it's lit by the Sun, and with a lighting pattern consistent with the Moon itself being a sphere. Meaning, the only way for a full moon to exist, would be if the Sun is almost directly beneath the Moon. But at that point, it should also be plainly visible from the same spot on Earth as well.
And then there's lunar eclipses, which is when the Moon starts off brightly lit - again by the Sun that's nowhere to be seen at the time - and then suddenly gets shadowed by a mysterious object, before returning to a fully lit state shortly after.
So - how does it all work? In the globe model, lunar phases and eclipses are easy to explain and demonstrate with even the simplest pictures and tools. And so are sunsets and sunrises.
Similarly, in the ancient disk model - where people didn't have to account for daytime in faraway nations - lunar phases and even eclipses could be explained by the Sun being beneath the Earth, and thus lighting the Moon from beneath as well. Just as sunrises and sunsets would simply mean the Sun rising and diving beneath the Earth disk.
But nowadays, if we have to account for international (dare I say global) day and night cycles, the only model that can explain all the above with no inconsistencies is that of the Earth being a sphere revolving around itself, the Moon revolving around it, and both of them revolving around the Sun.