Sex and gender are different or are they the same....you seem to be talking sex.
There are two main sexes - the gender thing is weird as fuck. Not because of the sexual stuff, but because they are logically fallacies to claim the idea of a social construct which is simultaneously up for personal choice and declaration....it's just bizarre....
--- the argument is a non-argument. Its designed to make you take away your rights by following to conclusion or to force others to define your rights for you..... Essentially it's lawyer bullshit and that it.
--- Essentially, the only answer is that if gender doesn't matter why does the label matter, and if the label doesn't matter why are laws telling us they do....and thus they must matter legally but does the law actually matter at the boundaries at biology - no...it's a purely social construct we are told...so the laws are just social constructs as well....so essentially we are in a battle of language but we are also In a battle of scopes...
Does sex exist - I would say yes, does gender exist... I would say no...but some think tanks feel they can rewrite the definitions of laws to become simultaneously both gendered and non-gendsred to ensure maximum doublespeak and allow for a miss-applied justice system.
That word salad is utter semantic bullshit. But I’m not going to ask why you’re here. You have no principles or rock foundation. You might do well taking a course in logic instead of rationality.
Spelling issues aside...you cannot follow the logic? I don't think I need a course in logic.
Let me rephrase for you - they are mixing up biological 'sex' with social 'gender'....but those who argue about gender are falling into a trap. You cannot defend a subjective thing....without defining it.... So you essentially make objective someone's subjective personal feelings....and then say that everyone must be called how they feel because they are supposed to....which is just rediculous and cannot be rationalized.
Sex and gender are different or are they the same....you seem to be talking sex.
There are two main sexes - the gender thing is weird as fuck. Not because of the sexual stuff, but because they are logically fallacies to claim the idea of a social construct which is simultaneously up for personal choice and declaration....it's just bizarre....
--- the argument is a non-argument. Its designed to make you take away your rights by following to conclusion or to force others to define your rights for you..... Essentially it's lawyer bullshit and that it.
--- Essentially, the only answer is that if gender doesn't matter why does the label matter, and if the label doesn't matter why are laws telling us they do....and thus they must matter legally but does the law actually matter at the boundaries at biology - no...it's a purely social construct we are told...so the laws are just social constructs as well....so essentially we are in a battle of language but we are also In a battle of scopes...
Does sex exist - I would say yes, does gender exist... I would say no...but some think tanks feel they can rewrite the definitions of laws to become simultaneously both gendered and non-gendsred to ensure maximum doublespeak and allow for a miss-applied justice system.
That word salad is utter semantic bullshit. But I’m not going to ask why you’re here. You have no principles or rock foundation. You might do well taking a course in logic instead of rationality.
Spelling issues aside...you cannot follow the logic? I don't think I need a course in logic.
Let me rephrase for you - they are mixing up biological 'sex' with social 'gender'....but those who argue about gender are falling into a trap. You cannot defend a subjective thing....without defining it.... So you essentially make objective someone's subjective personal feelings....and then say that everyone must be called how they feel because they are supposed to....which is just rediculous and cannot be rationalized.
You’re correct about your spelling. It’s “ rediculous”
Are you mentally rejected? Or just a loser with nothing to do?