I came on here because I am tired of conservatism being linked up with these fascist Nazis like the guy who killed the people in Buffalo.
Racist Nazis are not conservatives in the American tradition of honoring the Constitution and the values in the Declaration of Independence.
Race war Nazis, who take pride in mowing down innocent, unarmed people, have nothing to do with American conservativism which is about individual rights, responsibility, and liberty.
These horrendous acts by race war Nazis (I don't care if they call themselves Nazis or not, that's what they are) discredit conservatism. People think the choice is between murdering lunatics and Big Pharma controlled Democrats.
We are left with no choice.
And to top it off, these Nazis are destroying the greatness of America. We used to be proud of defeating Nazis. As a conservative, I was proud that we moved beyond slavery, fighting the Civil War (remember Republicans were against slavery, Democrats, for), many conservatives joined with the Civil Rights movement (against most Southern Democrats). Blacks fought with whites in World War 2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan.
We are one nation, under God, no matter what ethnicity we are, if we hold to the Constitution. That's what matters, not the color of someone's skin.
Race war Nazis are destroying that and destroying America, weakening us internally as well as externally.
So I'm going to say something radical: they want a war? We should take that war to them. I don't mean Black Americans should take the war to them. I mean patriotic Americans, black white, brown, whatever. They're going to shoot up innocent people? I say we start taking up arms against them. They're armed. They aren't innocent. They intend to do harm to Americans. They are a violent threat to Americans and America.
Patriots can give it to these cowardly Nazis shooting up unarmed citizens ten times over. 100 times over. Just wipe them from the face of the earth.
Who's with me?
Elements of this post are reminiscent of leftist msm propaganda talking points. Need to differentiate propaganda from evidence. What evidence exists to support certain conclusions? For example, I'll assert that a super majority of racism, acts of violence, and vandalism are caused by leftist other directly or via subterfuge.
I'm talking specifically about mass shootings of innocent people, such as the Buffalo shooter. This latest guy, too, was a racist. How many of these guys are on the 4chan boards? Quite a few.
I'm not saying that crimes haven't been committed by the left or by Black supremacist groups as well, such as the Black Israelites and the New Black Panther Party. I believe in the latter case, they target police officers. Everyone of them should also be taken out. I think one guy claimed to be Antifa, but there just aren't multiple examples of mass shooters claiming to be Antifa or leftists.
The assertion that a "super majority of racism, acts of violence, and violence are caused by leftist other [sic] directly or via subterfuge" is simply not measurable (how do you measure vandalism caused by subterfuge? Can you cite an example of that?
Again: I'm talking about mass killings that target schools, churches, supermarkets, 4th of July parades, etc that are motivated the spread of right-wing ideologies. The most cowardly of actions. Killing unarmed defenseless people. There's definitely a disproportionate number that are demonstrably motivated by the radical, fascist, white supremacist right.
Fascism is far left. Nazis are far left. Attempting to associate them with right wing is a purposeful misrepresentation of history intended to smear their political opponents. The far right is anarchism. The American republic defeated these ideologies a number of times in the past and yet they continue to attempt to promulgate their evil through subversion.
Seeking to measure it is potentially useful though agree challenging. You can measure it by examining the flow of factually inaccurate misrepresentation of history across sources. You can also track the funding sources of these compromised institutions.
You do not understand fascism if you think it's far left. What do you think "left" and "right" mean? Anarchism is far left. Anarchism means without hierarchy. An-archy. Without hierarchy. It's socialist, but without coercive government to enforce it. It also has no government to enforce "property rights" because in anarchy you don't have property rights as there is no private property.
Read the anarchists. Kropotkin, Bakunin.
Fascism is authoritarian corporatism whereby property remains in private hands (show me a fascist who argued otherwise) but both capitalists and labor were controlled by the Authoritarian, because under fascism there is one ruler.
If you can show me a fascist who believed in the primary principle of socialism, that the means of production should be in the hands of workers, not the capitalist, then I will grant you the point. You won't be able to. Fascists themselves believed they were creating a middle ground between capitalism and socialism, maintaining private property but with state direction of production.
You've fallen for false right-wing revisionism. You don't get to just rewrite definitions because it suits your sensibilities. What anarchism is was defined by anarchists. What fascism is was defined by fascists. Read them.
I've studied plenty of history and encourage you to take a look at the relationship between socialism, communism, and fascism. This is basically a continuum of increasing government control and involvement in people's personal lives. NAZIs we're socialists who on practice enacted fascist policies. The enlarged roll of the state is characteristic of leftist ideologies. The state is idyllic and the people are flawed. Anarchism being further to the right of corporatism suggests that self assembled corporate entities emerge as governing authorities. This is congruent with what we see both philosophically and in practice.
Please don't assume my support for something based upon my ability to describe it.