and upvote!
It is ok to not be aware of reality, it is like would you blame neo for living in the matrix?
now, if you have the time, you could begin by learning when nato was formed, who was involved and also have a look at some world war 2 history.
next you can review the cia origins and a variety of other related documented bits about this organization, who was involved and what type of actions they performed in their history to current.
you can learn about national endowment for democracy, you could learn about us aid.
from there you can look into the actions nato has been involved in who made which decisions and what the outcomes were.
you could study some ukrainian history and learn about the various different governmental changes over the past 30+/- years.
armed with this knowledge, perhaps you would understand more clearly what it is like to live next to a weaponized terrorist group that wants to reduce your country to ashes if possible.
after all 8 years have passed since 2014 and the beginning of this conflict, but given your leftist media has not provided you those details you are likely missing those bits. not many posts were created on reddit you see, likely were deleted.
if you have any questions, feel free I can try to provide more clarity.
lol? nothing burger ukraine? gee, you really need to gather a better understanding of what is current in the world with respect to resources and economy.
ukraine has been straight up plundered for far longer than 8 years and for far more than some piss pot of gas.
The whole leftist doll stuff is pretty inapplicable in the case of a country, it really just exemplifies a simplistic version of reality that does not equate to the real world.
for example, suggesting nato is incapable of causing issues and problems is pretty short sighted to say the least.
8 years of Ukraine shelling the Donbass. Russia invokes Kosovo precedent to defend the Donbass, since by UN rules Donbass has right to 1) self determination and 2) to call for help from another country.
Ukraine is not part of NATO, so there is no legal basis for NATO to intervene.
Nato was the aggressor in this situation. Russia invading today is irrelevant to the fact it was under a direct threat to its security.
How and Why is a huge bag of opposing interests, dating back centuries. Notably some are much more recently.
But the bottom line is Crimea is Russian. Contrary to any other assumptions. It has Sevastopol on it. The rest of Crimea largely supports that interest. It has a majority population of Russians and Russian infrastructure on it.
It however causes a huge geographical problem to the Ukrainian coastline. A coastline in 2017 that was building Nato bases on it, a few KM away from Russian nuclear bases. If you wanted the direct evidence of Nato aggression. Outside of any supposrd biolabs. Or arming the Ukraine population to fight against Russians, its own people wishing to remain Russian. Prior to this conflict, the risk of it was happening daily in the Black Sea. Nato vessels, were continously becoming hazardous to the point of collision. Risk that could only escalate into conflict. Conflict occurring as Ukraine sought to join Nato and armament continued threatening Russian infrastructure. Without further debating any other separatist Oblasts.
Of course Ukraine has its own security concerns, and costal issues. Although they are largely irrelevant. Without Nato expansion, and by neutrality, it wouldn't have occured to the level of the current conflict.
It would be unheard of for this not to have escalated anywhere else globally. It was inevitable. Simple consequence.
It doesn't mean I am Russian. But war was obvious. Obvious due to the geography. Outside of opposing interests and geopolitics. You simply cannot tell a nation to pack up their nuclear bases. Try it. Laughably, conflict.
I'll bite.
and upvote! It is ok to not be aware of reality, it is like would you blame neo for living in the matrix?
now, if you have the time, you could begin by learning when nato was formed, who was involved and also have a look at some world war 2 history.
next you can review the cia origins and a variety of other related documented bits about this organization, who was involved and what type of actions they performed in their history to current.
you can learn about national endowment for democracy, you could learn about us aid.
from there you can look into the actions nato has been involved in who made which decisions and what the outcomes were.
you could study some ukrainian history and learn about the various different governmental changes over the past 30+/- years.
armed with this knowledge, perhaps you would understand more clearly what it is like to live next to a weaponized terrorist group that wants to reduce your country to ashes if possible.
after all 8 years have passed since 2014 and the beginning of this conflict, but given your leftist media has not provided you those details you are likely missing those bits. not many posts were created on reddit you see, likely were deleted.
if you have any questions, feel free I can try to provide more clarity.
lol? nothing burger ukraine? gee, you really need to gather a better understanding of what is current in the world with respect to resources and economy.
ukraine has been straight up plundered for far longer than 8 years and for far more than some piss pot of gas.
The whole leftist doll stuff is pretty inapplicable in the case of a country, it really just exemplifies a simplistic version of reality that does not equate to the real world.
for example, suggesting nato is incapable of causing issues and problems is pretty short sighted to say the least.
8 years of Ukraine shelling the Donbass. Russia invokes Kosovo precedent to defend the Donbass, since by UN rules Donbass has right to 1) self determination and 2) to call for help from another country.
Ukraine is not part of NATO, so there is no legal basis for NATO to intervene.
I don't understand this post at all.
Nato was the aggressor in this situation. Russia invading today is irrelevant to the fact it was under a direct threat to its security.
How and Why is a huge bag of opposing interests, dating back centuries. Notably some are much more recently.
But the bottom line is Crimea is Russian. Contrary to any other assumptions. It has Sevastopol on it. The rest of Crimea largely supports that interest. It has a majority population of Russians and Russian infrastructure on it.
It however causes a huge geographical problem to the Ukrainian coastline. A coastline in 2017 that was building Nato bases on it, a few KM away from Russian nuclear bases. If you wanted the direct evidence of Nato aggression. Outside of any supposrd biolabs. Or arming the Ukraine population to fight against Russians, its own people wishing to remain Russian. Prior to this conflict, the risk of it was happening daily in the Black Sea. Nato vessels, were continously becoming hazardous to the point of collision. Risk that could only escalate into conflict. Conflict occurring as Ukraine sought to join Nato and armament continued threatening Russian infrastructure. Without further debating any other separatist Oblasts.
Of course Ukraine has its own security concerns, and costal issues. Although they are largely irrelevant. Without Nato expansion, and by neutrality, it wouldn't have occured to the level of the current conflict.
It would be unheard of for this not to have escalated anywhere else globally. It was inevitable. Simple consequence.
It doesn't mean I am Russian. But war was obvious. Obvious due to the geography. Outside of opposing interests and geopolitics. You simply cannot tell a nation to pack up their nuclear bases. Try it. Laughably, conflict.
In 2014, nothing happend. In 2022 rusia invaded. The end. Happy now?