How does it feel to be on the same side as antifa?
(i.postimg.cc)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
MEAN (wanting dignity of mind) -ING (suffix; to fasten) aka want tempting life towards death. The suggested meaning of life tempts to aim towards death; while the response-ability to sustain life represents adaptation (choice) to origin (balance). It's why they can't find meaning; since whenever they get what they want; they want more; which diminishes what they have.
Purpose represents before being set; good (want) vs bad (not want) represents choice after being set.
Infinity inspires need through hunger; while tempting want with flavor.
That would be suggested understanding; which tempts them to ignore growing comprehension out of perceived knowledge; while prodding ignorance seems to tempt them to ignore even harder.
And here we have talmudic reasoning attempting to undermine natural law. To disclaim implies a suggested claim; which the one suggesting then waives upon those consenting; hence trying to shirk responsibility over ignoring need (perceived) for want (suggested). It doesn't matter if one uses contract law (religo); discloses all the consequences, or makes multiple consent rituals mandatory (sign here, here and here). Each choice counts as a response to balance (need) or imbalance (want) and so any suggestion represents a choice of ignorance (less ignorance than those consenting to it though).
Rich (want) vs poor (not want); hence both sides being trapped within the scheme (reasoning). What's being ignored is the need to evaluate (choice) perceived value (balance); while resisting suggested values (imbalance).
How is the offer (vending machine) powered? Ongoing flow. What do you represent within that offer? Temporary form. Where are flowing? Death. What are you temporary forming? Life. How do you form life; while flowing towards death? Resistance to velocity aka growth within loss. In other words...you view the inspiration that offers; yet ignore the temptation of how it offers (motion). You exist as choice in-between inspiration (need) and temptation (want). Living implies dying; growing implies losing.
...while resisting dying for want of being done.
Is he leading you towards following or impressing inspiration for you to resist following? Like always...hold your breath to realize that death is just within reach an any moment. It's not like you would miss the way without a guide.
It's as if perceiving by senses represents the "as of yet untapped" potential for comprehension.
That implies resisting to uphold fiction (suggested) within self; while ignoring reality (perceived) and keeping (want) tempts to ignore adapting (need). The lens needs to be used in response to the source of light; yet is tempted by suggested substitutes (so shiny; so precious).
I stick to free for all sound anyway.
Like tuning into inspiration.
Which ignores being "within" the source of light; hence differentiated out of it; which in return allows the growth of enlightenment (comprehension of perceived). Instant enlightenment would imply being the light; not the reaction to it.
Outcome implies suggested (want) over perceived (need); hence causing want (positive) vs not want (negative) conflicts of reason. What's the positive outcome of inception to life to death?
Those within reason (want vs not want) want confirmation from other form; while ignoring CON (conducted; lead) FIRM (form) -ATION (through action). And reselling also implies the power to define by suggestions the meaning of words; hence selling justifications for ignorance.
Corruption of needed growth for wanted convenience. The few are burying the potential of the many by cementing their habitats.
The potential to shape everywhere...especially when ignored by the many.
Flavor implies those perceiving it. Infinity represents the generator of perceivable for the reactors within. Taste represents the finite (want) within the infinite (need).
Speaking about knowledge (perceivable) represents the use of words; which tempts others as suggested meaning to seek understanding (standing under suggested) over comprehension (compressed out of impressed perception).
Aka the difference between writing while adapting to inspiration and others using what you wrote to hold you accountable for the meaning of information. Whatever I write was already processed when I'm done; so why allowing myself to be tempted into remembering that which was (information) for that which is (inspiration)?
Knowledge represents "on demand" service with you being put into it; while the shelf represents your memory, and the grenades all the information you consent to uphold there as a potential threat. Notice also that grenades are used within EN (put in) TRENCH (ditch) MENT (mind; memory) to cause annoyance.
Everything suggested tempts standing under those suggesting it.
Reason is shaped out of choosing want (suggested) over need (perceived). If you claim (want) a suggestion within already perceivable; then that implies that there's a choice to not want to claim it; hence causing the want vs not want conflict of reason. That also represents the origin of division among already differentiated, while suggestion represents weaponized temptation.
One doesn't have to fight within to perpetuate reason...any suggestion tempts others to reason over its meaning; hence any suggested word over the perceived sound. We have an entire bunch of loophole crooks pretending to shirk responsibility onto the choice of consent, but suggesting (want) over expressing perceivable (need) represents willing ignorance of shared consequences. Eventually the loopholes they're digging become too deep to climb out of; at which point they probably pretend to always have been cave-dwellers and that being at the core is so much more valuable than those pesky surface critters.
The whole legalese deception represents yet another loophole for operating commerce among the few; while simultaneously racketeering the many with a contradicting set of rules.
The maintenance of these machines implies them being charged as form through flow; hence being in the process of dying. The know how you put into to sustain and exploit them represents your own resistance for the sustenance of self, hence your recharging.
The increase of lesser forms represents the decrease of potential caused by ignoring that flow isn't a selling vendor; but a demanding lender. The many are tricked to claim ownership in exchange for given value; while they ignore that a) flow represents given value; form the responding evaluation and b) that borrowing temporary form while ignoring the interest (from inter+esse aka being within essence) to the demanding lender.
Grouching Guitarist: "overcompensating much?"
Add motion to this and you get impressed inspiration; perceivable by senses; inwardly compressed (comprehension) for outwardly expression...all within the same flow. So instead of focusing on outward or inward; the "through" has to be comprehended. Think food...inward; through; outward. The potential is shaped within the "through".
That because each seed of potential represents an ecosystem ready for expression within the soil of all potentiality. The ONE plant reaches into ALL soil; while the choice to put it in a pot restricts growth aka artificial barriers within natural generation.
Hey fellow social media aficionados; our voting system is the bees knees and our emojis are totally rad. Make sure to share; like and subscribe. xD