I continually see memes quoting statistics that claim to show the ineffectiveness of vaccines.
Anybody with even middle school level math competency should be able to see through the misrepresentation of these statistics.
A recent example stated that 85.7% of deaths over a particular week in Scotland were vaccinated people. The conclusion drawn was that the vaccines don't work because the vast majority of people dying were vaccinated.
What was left out in the post was that 94% of Scotland has received at least 1 dose and 74% has received 3 doses. That leaves only less than 6% of the population unvaxxed accounting for 12% of the deaths. This data suggests (suggests, doesn't prove anything), just the opposite of the conclusion drawn.
Misuse of statistics makes people look either stupid or dishonest. If you see something posted like this, you should immediately question your source. Anybody passing off this kind of stuff isn't vetting their sources or their numbers either through actual intent to mislead or sheer stupidity. Either way, the source cannot be trusted. Trusting such a source is just allowing yourself to be duped (which makes you a dupe) or a liar yourself.
Hold yourself to higher standards of integrity, please, everybody. It doesn't help anybody to lie about facts or pass on lies about facts.
You are considered unvaxxed if you have not had a booster ie shot number 3. Unvaxxed stats are full of people who've had 2 shots and perhaps even three now that they are recommending a fourth. Classifying someone with three shots as "unvaxxed" is a misuse of stats.
The report I mentioned disaggregated all that data.
No it didn't. You're a propagandists handshake account and there's absolutely nothing to back up your story. You're just saying numbers that have nothing to do with anything
Yes, it did. Did you read the study? I don't think you did.
I know you want to say that anybody who calls you on your misinformation is a "handshake" or "glowie" or whatever other thought ending memes you want to throw out. But the fact that your response is just to gainsay, wave hands, and use thought-enders, tells me that you've given up trying to defend your misinformation.
You're either lying to yourself or you're lying to everybody else.
You didn't inform readers of your post of the numerous disclaimers in the report:
You didn't mention that in Scotland, a high number of people are vaccinated:
These are all direct quotes from your source. None of which you mention in your little meme post. The purpose is clearly to mislead people into thinking the vaccines are not effective, just the opposite of what the data show.
So if you read the report, why did you pass on misleading information about it? Were you trying to be honest?
https://thecountersignal.com/99-per-cent-covid-deaths-in-canada-among-vaccinated/
Tell me how "duh maffs be wong" with this, glowie
Even though they may have mentioned percentages who received 2 and 3 doses, Scotland's "fully vaccinated" classification only applies to people with 3 doses or more:
https://young.scot/get-informed/national/scotland-coronavirus-rules-right-now#Vaccine%20Certification%20Scheme
This means their "unvaccinated classification", which I'm sure they're encouraged to avoid talking about, will include many people with 2 doses, those who had their 2nd dose 4 months or more ago and not a third. And there's more and more of those every day.
Soon triple jabbers will be thrown into that category too.
Funny games.
Fully vaccinated means "fully vaccinated." I've been clear about that in all my posts. Health officials have stated that one or two doses are much less effective than 3 doses or 3 doses + booster. So why should people not fully vaccinated be included with the fully vaccinated?
But you could do that math, too, if you thought it would make the case better. Notably, you did not do that. Why? Because it doesn't really help you. So let's throw in the insufficiently vaccinated population.
Deaths Dec 14 - Apr 17 Partially Vaccinated: 881 Fully Vaccinated: 2,832 Fully+Booster: 1,995 Total: 5,708
Unvaccinated: 9,512
Total Deaths: 15,220
%Deaths Partially or Fully vaccinated: 5,708/15,220 = 37.5% %Deaths Unvaccinated: 62.5%
So congratulations, you managed to argue that if you include insufficiently vaccinated people with fully vaccinated people, you move the needle about 4%.
Now. If you could have done the math, or just look at the figure and make reasonable estimations, you would have known that your argument wasn't going to help you much. The % of deaths of unvaccinated are still far greater than insufficiently and fully vaccinated people. This is true despite the fact that there are more total people in the vaccinated pool:
Partially + Fully Vaccinated Total: 1,066,884 Unvaccinated: 945,183 Total: 2,012,067
%Population Partially + Fully Vaccinated: 53% %Population Unvaccinated: 47%
So if vaccines were as effective as say a plecebo, you would expect no difference in % deaths amongst all the groups. Instead we find that % of unvaccinated far outweighs % of vaccinated deaths.
You guys continually try to fudge these numbers are try to find a way to build cognitive to walls around your false beliefs. Or you're just lying.
"Insufficiently vaccinated" LMAO. I don't believe or trust the "health officials". So really, you've wasted your time on me writing all this. Maybe you'll get some fool who read it to get jabbed, good luck to them if that's the case.