Roe V. Wade set several precedents. One of these legal precedents was to uphold the right to individual bodily autonomy in medical decisions based on an interpretation that the constitutional right to privacy extended to medical decisions. (obviously "bodily autonomy" doesn't apply if you consider the fetus to be a separate life. But that was not the court's take)
Back to the main point: They cannot mandate the vaccine if you have a right to privacy and bodily autonomy in medical decisions.
And even without a federal law like Roe, blue states would still keep abortion legal.
So I suspect the federal government is willing to sacrifice Roe V. Wade if it means they can mandate the vaccine.
Thoughts?
I had the same thought, I think you are correct. Why else would the RINO and commi judges vote unanimously to overturn it?
A secondary goal would be to rally midterm support for democrats because lefties are so hell bent on sacrificing children, they will forget about how the Dems have run our country into the ground.
A third goal may be to rally support to alter the Supreme Court, such as adding more justices.