- He could have easily slowly acquired the necessary shares using shell companies not listed in his name.
- This is a common tactic and given his notoriety it is a no brainier. Later you consolidate those shares in a series of private transactions and the majority owner becomes clearly known. This happens all the time but somehow he can't figure this out?
- Now we have the DOJ actively interfering with private market operations- a huge expanse of scope and a departmental overreach.
- We also have direct evidence linking Twitter to gov agency influence operations
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Your basic premise is wrong, you assume that Musk is somehow an anti government entity and for free market. Study his companies and you will fins the opposite.
That's not my point of view but rather the populist point of view as evidenced by the shrill cries of liberals. The purpose of this post was to deconstruct this by illustrating counter examples