Nothing he has specifically said makes me not trust him (though he often makes mistakes and leaps of logic) but just his "vibe". Something about how he carries himself just doesn't feel like an authentic truth teller, putting his life on the line. I don't know, is it just me?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
He doesn't ask the questions he should and instead schedules nonstop speaking tours with alt media and controlled op
One thing I'd think he'd want to do if he truly thinks there is "snake venom" would be to obtain vials of vaccine and remdesivir (shouldn't be too hard for a doctor with his connections) and test them using some protein identification techniques.
It would be a pretty routine process to check a protein's amino acid sequence against those of known toxins (including snake venom) to see what is there if anything.
He and Mike Adams are both trying to get a sample of it. A new Q&A session was just released. They take about the “watch the water” stuff, which he admits he could be wrong about it and that he is hoping that people with the right skill sets (scientists, etc) will take this info and dig for themselves. They also discuss trying to get a sample of the drug to test. I think it’s prudent we all do our own research on what he suggests. We all know something is fishy about c19. I don’t think we should outright discredit anyone without doing our own research into it. I have started my own. I do think his interview with Mike Adams was perhaps his best. Due to the fact that he presented news articles and scientific research papers. He seems to be someone who is on the spectrum, but I’m not a doctor. This could explain his “excitement” over his findings. I know when I connect dots, even horrible ones, I get excited to share the info and help people.