It looks like the black WI driver who mowed people down in the parade was a criminal who worked alone who had anti-white propaganda push him over the edge.
The black NYC shooter may have worked alone (doesn't look like it). I think he was a mentally ill man who was pushed into it, like the Sandy Hook shooter.
No tit-for-tat attacks on blacks as of yet though. If there is one, fully expect the full weight of the system to give the Alex Jones treatment to the race realists (or outright racists) over at VDare and American Renaissance and conpro.win and lots of other sites/commentators. Even normie(ish) conservatives are making 13/52 comments these days, like Mark Dice, and race realism has gone mainstream.
My hypothesis is they are trying to prompt a retaliatory attack, but one that won't fall apart under scrutiny like Jan 6th Reichstag Fire or the MI gov kidnapping entrapment.
Of course, I really can't test this hypothesis, so it's more of a theory really.
I've not seen it, but I can easily picture it as described. The graphics are better that way anyway.
I'm on the fence about some of those items, as there is actually less pollution in many cases than a generation ago in the water and soil. However, I do fully understand the effect on large masses of people with marginal/borderline functional IQs and with low self control. This is because I have done some reading about how the introduction of large quantities of lead into the environment with the mass introduction of the automobile (and leaded gasoline) and what it did to the public.
Now, some of it is correlation and multi-causal, but the generation that came up with lead everywhere, especially in the rain water (get the soil tested in any urban environment, you'd be shocked) created the crime waves of the 1960s and into the 1970s, and then they aged out of crime in their mid 30s and the crime rate started to drop. Then the next generation came up after the banning of lead gasoline and then we had crime rates start to drop by the late 1980s and into the late 2010s, where we were at 1950s levels of violence. Meanwhile, a high IQ nation like Japan had just as much lead everywhere as in America, but no associated crime epidemic.
edit to add that crime rates stated to go back up with the "racial reckoning" and associated de-policing of black America starting in the mid 2010s.
Were the rates of crime in the 60s or 70s significantly higher than previous decades?
If so, increased reporting, centralization of policeforces in urban and sub urban areas..
I feel like there has always been crime and stats show it’s been decreasing the last 40 years sans the last 2... freakonomics guy correlated it with the abortion law being passed in 72? And unwanted children were able to be discarded before birth..
Th is shows a huge decrease in crime In the 90s
Besides lead what made the 6s and 70s diff in terms of crime
Yes, crime rates were much higher in the 1960s and 1970s. Murder rates, and crimes that tend to get reported regardless of police presence were higher.
The case has been made that legalization of abortion played a role in the reduction of crime, as well as the "broken windows" model of policing, and the large increase in the prison population due to the 1980s drug war and the tough on crime laws passed at the time. Really, it's likely some aspect of all these things mentioned, but how much weight you can ascribe to each we can't say.
What we can say, is after the de-policing of inner city areas after the Ferguson riots, the murder rate has gone up and up.