The real problem is no one seems to understand the enormity of what this all means.
No one's immune system is ever supposed to be permenantly flooded with antibodies to any pathogen. Antibodies are only supposed to be formed in response to infection after which they dissapate. IgG antibodies have a half life of just a few weeks. So three weeks after infection there would be about half as many circulating antibodies as there was during the infection. After 6 weeks, one quarter left. After 9 weeks one eighth left etc.
That should never matter because one of the functions of the immune system is memory. Once it spent a week or two learning how to build the nuetralizing antibodies the first time, it should be able to build them again at a moments notice. Effectively giving the immune system a rapid response capability. The is why the main purpose of vaccine is to create that rapid response memory.
So why are the health authorities presenting this narrative that supposes we should have permenantly high levels of circulating antibodies?
There can only be one reason. The immune system is not forming that memory. Without the memory, we would always in the vulnerable state of needing two weeks to re-learn how to build the antibodies every time we are infected during which time the virus replicates freely and does its damage so it looks like they are trying to combat that lack of memory by keeping everyone with high levels of antibodies at all times by repeatedly reintroducing the vaccine as if it is new infection.
My theory is, they feel we need to do that because they know the virus is immunodeficiency and it probably hides in inactive immune system cells like HIV does. When these inactive immune system cells become active in response to another type of infection, the virus is also activated. It starts to replicate and begins spreading again. If our immune system is not functioning properly it will not remember how to neutralize it. Therefore the virus has 2 weeks grace to cause damage while the immune system relearns how to neutralize it so it causes more hidden cardio problems and neurological problems etc, who even knows what else. By the time the nuetralizing antibodies are ready, the virus has infected more immune system cells too. How many times can we survive all that?
Thanks axo if you are interested there is published research although this paper is very technical. I have trouble understanding all of it but it appears the CD19 gene has something to do with all of this. I think CD19 is responsible for the creation of b lymphocyte memory cells and SARS-CoV-2 infection damages that in some way so if we no longer have immune system memory this could mean none of our vaccinations will work. I wonder if that would mean smallpox, polio and all those other diseases we are routinely vaccinated against, make a big comeback.
The real problem is no one seems to understand the enormity of what this all means. No one's immune system is ever supposed to be permenantly flooded with antibodies to any pathogen. Antibodies are only supposed to be formed in response to infection after which they dissapate. IgG antibodies have a half life of just a few weeks. So three weeks after infection there would be about half as many circulating antibodies as there was during the infection. After 6 weeks, one quarter left. After 9 weeks one eighth left etc.
That should never matter because one of the functions of the immune system is memory. Once it spent a week or two learning how to build the nuetralizing antibodies the first time, it should be able to build them again at a moments notice. Effectively giving the immune system a rapid response capability. The is why the main purpose of vaccine is to create that rapid response memory.
So why are the health authorities presenting this narrative that supposes we should have permenantly high levels of circulating antibodies?
There can only be one reason. The immune system is not forming that memory. Without the memory, we would always in the vulnerable state of needing two weeks to re-learn how to build the antibodies every time we are infected during which time the virus replicates freely and does its damage so it looks like they are trying to combat that lack of memory by keeping everyone with high levels of antibodies at all times by repeatedly reintroducing the vaccine as if it is new infection.
My theory is, they feel we need to do that because they know the virus is immunodeficiency and it probably hides in inactive immune system cells like HIV does. When these inactive immune system cells become active in response to another type of infection, the virus is also activated. It starts to replicate and begins spreading again. If our immune system is not functioning properly it will not remember how to neutralize it. Therefore the virus has 2 weeks grace to cause damage while the immune system relearns how to neutralize it so it causes more hidden cardio problems and neurological problems etc, who even knows what else. By the time the nuetralizing antibodies are ready, the virus has infected more immune system cells too. How many times can we survive all that?
great insight, whew
Thanks axo if you are interested there is published research although this paper is very technical. I have trouble understanding all of it but it appears the CD19 gene has something to do with all of this. I think CD19 is responsible for the creation of b lymphocyte memory cells and SARS-CoV-2 infection damages that in some way so if we no longer have immune system memory this could mean none of our vaccinations will work. I wonder if that would mean smallpox, polio and all those other diseases we are routinely vaccinated against, make a big comeback.
SARS-CoV-2 infection causes immunodeficiency in recovered patients by downregulating CD19 expression in B cells via enhancing B-cell metabolism