There are three sentences. The first one is similar to the name of the video. The second, is a time stamp for a specific, section of the video, that is of interest. The third details who the Colonel is, and his history with the military.
Col Fletcher Prouty explains Elite Strategy over time.
Future warfare is the energy/food era see video @7mins.
He spent 9 years at Pentagon working with Allen Dulles on CIA Ops, briefing Joint Chiefs/Sec of Def, supplying Air Force Pilots, Bases, Logistics, Planes including U2s for CIA Covert Ops.
A grammatical check of the sentence shows 1 to 2 errors, specifically the lack of a comma, and the use of the shorthand "@". A bad sentence yes, though a sentence none the less.
We need the mods to make a new rule requiring posts to be titled with complete coherent sentences
There are three sentences. The first one is similar to the name of the video. The second, is a time stamp for a specific, section of the video, that is of interest. The third details who the Colonel is, and his history with the military.
Col Fletcher Prouty explains Elite Strategy over time.
Future warfare is the energy/food era see video @7mins.
He spent 9 years at Pentagon working with Allen Dulles on CIA Ops, briefing Joint Chiefs/Sec of Def, supplying Air Force Pilots, Bases, Logistics, Planes including U2s for CIA Covert Ops.
Future warfare is the energy/food era see video @7mins
That is definitely not a sentence
A grammatical check of the sentence shows 1 to 2 errors, specifically the lack of a comma, and the use of the shorthand "@". A bad sentence yes, though a sentence none the less.
Please indicate where the comma goes in this sentence:
"Future warfare is the energy/food era see video @7mins."
Then explain what in the flying fuck "future warfare is the energy/food era" means.