SputnikV is nearly same as AstraZeneca and possibly from single source. Both are modified adenoviruses with that SARS-Cov-2 spike protein instead of adenovirus one.
There are little info on not-a-vaxx side effects in Russia, there are no any VAERS or any other vaccines side efeects tracking at all, so to estimate the damage from not-a-vaxx in Russia you could use side effects data on AstraZeneca not-a-vaxx, they have to be the same.
I think it is "spike protein" itself. Everything from failed virus to not-a-vaccines was developed to deliver that "spike protein" into human bodies.
Even if you look at simple fact, that natural human immunity to regular coronaviruses is based on capsid and spike mount proteins and not on the spike proteins of coronaviruses (and other viruses with spikes, like adenoviruses or flu too), you will easily figure out that all that vaxx shit have absolutely nothing to do with providing immunity to failed (or planned, but non-existent) virus.
SputnikV is nearly same as AstraZeneca and possibly from single source. Both are modified adenoviruses with that SARS-Cov-2 spike protein instead of adenovirus one.
There are little info on not-a-vaxx side effects in Russia, there are no any VAERS or any other vaccines side efeects tracking at all, so to estimate the damage from not-a-vaxx in Russia you could use side effects data on AstraZeneca not-a-vaxx, they have to be the same.
The spike protein gene is the only common denominator.
I think it is "spike protein" itself. Everything from failed virus to not-a-vaccines was developed to deliver that "spike protein" into human bodies.
Even if you look at simple fact, that natural human immunity to regular coronaviruses is based on capsid and spike mount proteins and not on the spike proteins of coronaviruses (and other viruses with spikes, like adenoviruses or flu too), you will easily figure out that all that vaxx shit have absolutely nothing to do with providing immunity to failed (or planned, but non-existent) virus.