Firstly, let's keep this a non-shill post; just give your honest opinions and don't spam/troll everyone.
I'll start:
I voted for Trump both times. Just like most everybody else on our side, I liked his style of just shooting straight and no politically correct faggotry. I also believed in his plan short outlined in his PDF document, flattening taxes, fixing immigration, some basic stuff, etc.
I was also of the mindset that I would rather have Bowser running the country than some bureaucrat piece of shit scumbag.
And of course there was no other choice that would have had a chance of winning; but to mention, the libertarian candidate was not even a real libertarian like Ron Paul (say what you will about libertarians, but Ron Paul has kept it real for his entire career, never voted for a tax increase or for a war or for gun control or for any bullshit that people on here would be against - Ron Paul was /our guy/ for all intents and purposes). There was no Ron Paul to choose from in 2016.
But...
I always felt like there was a good chance we were being scammed, because you just had to know that NBC, CNN, etc. we're not stupid enough to not realize that they were helping Trump get elected with all their non-stop media coverage. Also, there was the pictures of Trump hanging out with the Clintons. Say whatever you want about elites in general hanging out in the same circles; the Clintons are pure evil, and there is no excuse to be associating with them. These were the first alarm bells that went off, for me.
Fast forward to 2020...
When the "pandemic" began and it became clear that Trump was pro-vaccine, I knew it was part of whatever evil plan they were concocting. Then you had him playing into the black bullshit, talking about getting 500 billion fucking dollars to people based on their skin color; absolutely inexcusable nonsense.
The final nail in the coffin was the Jan 6 situation. After his tweet about "be there, will be wild", everyone expected, "OK, he's not gonna abandon the country", etc. and then... he just took off out of that place and left everybody in that trap.
I tried to justify all of it in my mind that maybe he didn't have the turnout that he needed to pull off whatever he was planning, or maybe he truly was expecting the VP to be on his side, etc. But, no matter what the real story was, the bottom line is that everybody who was there for him and for the country deserved an explanation and they never got one. Instead, they were all abandoned like trash on the side of the road. Never mind the people that went in to the capital building and got arrested later, etc. many of those people were also fucked over and out for what was trespassing at worst. I'm just talking about the hundreds of thousands of people who set their lives aside to travel to DC. Unless Trump was secretly under arrest or something behind the scenes, there was absolutely no fucking excuse for that shit. It's a tough truth to swallow, which is why so many people remain stuck in that maze.
Regardless of whether he was actually on our side at one point or if the whole thing was a scam, it hurts your ego to accept that we were all abandoned and left on a sinking ship while the captain took off back to his paradise. So instead, most people just make some kind of justification up for themselves or accept one of the existing theories, or they pretend to believe in the Q nonsense, in order to not face the truth.
With all that said...
There are some things that I can't explain and that confuse me to this day. When Trump supposedly got COVID-19 there was this really suspicious period of time where he kind of like disappeared, and then he was on video in a situation that was clearly proven to be a deep fake video (his collar was going into his neck and stuff, there was all kinds of anomalies in the video, etc.). In my mind, there's a possibility that there was no real Trump in view all the way from that moment up until perhaps the early summer of 2021. What this means, assuming there's a chance that it's true, I have no idea, but I can imagine some nightmare scenarios. I understand this comes across as a cope as well, but it's not. I just would like for somebody to rectify the several clear deep fake videos of trump talking to America. There's no way he put those out of laziness or something. Something was going on, and I suspect we will never know what that is. My only speculation was that he stepped out of line when he suggested that people could use HCQ in lieu of the vaccine, and they locked him up somewhere and replaced them with deep fake videos for the remainder of his presidency. I can't imagine such an insane thing actually happening, but I also can't figure out for the life of me what else could possibly explain the anomalies that began in November and didn't end until perhaps May.
I also cannot rectify the anomalies pertaining the supposed inauguration of Biden. I was watching all this stuff like a hawk and there were so many weird things that happened on that day, the days before it, and the weeks after. I truly do not believe there was an inauguration held in DC on the supposed day of the inauguration. Some people say "they had to record it before because of security", but the reality is that the constitution does not provide for such a provision, which would make him not a valid president even if they did do it for that reason. Then the fact that they surrounded the police with giant walls and we're constructing some kind of nonsense out front, all of the studio photos/videos of Biden in the fake Oval Office, etc., etc. Mike Pompeo stating, confidently, that there would be a second Trump administration. All of this stuff just doesn't add up to what is ostensibly happening in DC. Aside from the crazy theory in my prior paragraph, I also thought, at the time, "what if we were actually invited by the Chinese and they were using AI and special effects and shit to take over our country from within and convince us that the government was intact", or some kind of crazy shit like that. It's just impossible to explain the situation using any normal logic.
What are your thoughts?
Aside from Q (which everybody already knows is just "trust the plan"), What are your theories to explain the anomalies that I described in my last paragraphs above, and pertaining what really happened
I agree on the heel part - literally, Trump's public persona ever since he started running for president, is the same one he used in his appearances in pro wrestling shows. It's vastly different from how he acted, for instance, on The Apprentice. That attitude, the mean tweets, the theatrics surrounding "rallies" etc. feels designed to be as divisive as possible - because pretty much anyone not already on board with him will decry it as boorish posturing.
Meanwhile, his policies - as in, the ones that were actually implemented - were old Republican tried-and-trues - reduced regulations and taxes, more military spending etc. Nothing others haven't done before. Even "the wall" ended up as a dud.
And then there was the rigged election... For one, I'm pretty sure it was rigged - there's no chance for that many statistical anomalies alone, let alone all the other details. However, I feel that his response was all but intentionally ineffective, even ridiculous - from using the "Four Seasons Landscaping" yard as a press-conference venue, to presenting court documents riddled with typos even on the first page, to the way every rally since has been the same-old-same-old "I won, it was rigged, we will fight" etc. In short, I suspect that he knew it would be rigged and didn't do a thing about it. That he wanted out, at least for the time being.
And as to why he did, and what unified theory can explain the overall plot - my best guess is, it ties in with the current situation in Ukraine, which itself is a continuation of the events in 2014 (so I'm not just tacking it on since it's trending right now). The overall goal of both sides - Russia and the US - is to disentangle their economies, preventing a domino effect of any future financial crisis. So far, so good. The chosen mechanism - a military crisis that would be the excuse for Russia to be "expelled" from all the major financial systems, especially ones dependent on the dollar. Possibly even the COVID pandemic, which limited tourist economies and overall public movement around the world, but that's a topic for another day.
However, this couldn't happen during Trump's term, because his more aggressive image wouldn't sit well with him doing nothing in response to Russia's own aggression. After all, he's still the guy who threatened "Rocket Man" with using his own red button. So, a solution is devised: Trump "loses" the next elections - to Biden, the guy even democrats didn't believe could win - while maintaining some presence in the public eye, keeping the fire burning. Next, Putin proceeds with "Operation: Economic Divorce" at Biden's expense image-wise, and when the crisis is all wrapped up by 2024, Trump can return and resume his "tough but diplomatic" policy on Russia, either with Putin himself, or his possible successor (since both the US and the Russian elections coincide in 2024).
The aftermath: A much-needed streamlining and stabilization of major national economies, a severe image toll on the democrats in the US, and the avoidance of a ton of actual bloodshed instead of the social media circus that's the current Ukraine crisis. And a mutual tip-of-the-hat between Langley and Lubyanka, celebrating nearly a century of professional cooperation... minor lapses notwithstanding.
This is a great comment; thanks for your insight. I also suspect you are correct (re: 2024).
There is just one more thing to add. Namely, why it needs to happen like this. Why Russia can't just say "you know what, this financial system is unstable and we're pulling out". And that's because it will turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's a well-documented phenomenon - rumors spread that a bank is about to go under. As a result, people withdraw their cash from it, so it loses all liquidity and ability to operate. As a result, it goes under.
Now, apply this to the international scale, and it's a situation that even the Russians don't want; neither do the Chinese or the Indians. A financial crisis is one thing, but when the whole system gets shaken all at once, it becomes dangerous, even to nominally independent parties. Even Russia barely survived the 90s mobster reign of terror after the Union collapsed, and if something similar happens in the west, the fallout might as well be nuclear for all the damage it would do.
So instead, this grand theatrical gambit is played, where national economies are amicably separated under false pretenses, and each side will in fact boast its financial resilience, citing... whatever crap suits their audience. And the game continues for another turn. The only question I'm pondering is whether the head pieces after 2024 will still be Trump and Putin, or their possible spiritual successors. But that one's for time to tell.