I have been looking at pictures of the civilian buildings the mainstream media claims were damaged by Russian missiles and shelling yet all of them have street level damage to the front facade of the building that is consistant with a large ground level explosion outside the front of the building. This is the damage pattern consistant with a large car bomb.
Sure it is possible for a missile to land in the street close to a building but I think it suspicious that this same damage pattern is evident every time they claim the Russians attacked a civilian target.
The damage pattern from shelling or missile strikes would usually be from projectiles travelling more or less horizontally that had to clear the roofs of surrounding buildings before they hit the target building so the damage would be a penetration damage high up on the target building with an explosion inside. That would not leave the 100 yards wide spread of damage to the outside face of the front facade of the building at street level that we are seeing.
Shelling and aerial bombing are high angle attacks that could easily land a bomb in a courtyard or street. It they also usually leave little pieces if they detonate, so the pictures of partial missile debris as proof is unconvincing to me. Who did what is also hard to determine. How are we to know if a food delivery truck was delivering food to troops, and therefore a non-war crime target, even if later it is portrayed as an attack on civilians?