I have been looking at pictures of the civilian buildings the mainstream media claims were damaged by Russian missiles and shelling yet all of them have street level damage to the front facade of the building that is consistant with a large ground level explosion outside the front of the building. This is the damage pattern consistant with a large car bomb.
Sure it is possible for a missile to land in the street close to a building but I think it suspicious that this same damage pattern is evident every time they claim the Russians attacked a civilian target.
The damage pattern from shelling or missile strikes would usually be from projectiles travelling more or less horizontally that had to clear the roofs of surrounding buildings before they hit the target building so the damage would be a penetration damage high up on the target building with an explosion inside. That would not leave the 100 yards wide spread of damage to the outside face of the front facade of the building at street level that we are seeing.
No. Look at that picture linked. The surrounding ground, has craters, and the trees are blown off. The building has cracks, and has visible fire damage inside. The entire building has been hit in that photo from various points. It has different impacts. Shelling. Artillery likely there.
Nobody sane cares if russia levels the whole corrupt shithole.
No body sane would wish indiscriminate death on millions of people.
I don't give a fuck about any government, or nation, what you say is inhuman.
You clearly need more life experience to widen your worldview before you are capable of having opinions on what 'sane' cares are.
where is the outrage of all the men, women and children dying in united states bombing yemen and somalia as we speak?
......thought so