Lockdown Debate Was Skewed Because Skeptical Scientists Had Less 'Twitter Firepower' - Conspiracies

Conspiracies

Communities Topics

Hot

All Posts

DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy

Lockdown Debate Was Skewed Because Skeptical Scientists Had Less 'Twitter Firepower' (pbs.twimg.com)

posted 4 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 4 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +25 / -0

2 comments

2 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (2)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– axolotl_peyotl [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

World should have listened to these esteemed professors @MartinKulldorff @sunetragupta @DrJBhattacharya and focused on protecting and treating the elderly and high-risk while leaving the rest of the population alone.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

Message the Moderators

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)