"perpetual motion" and being impossible due to the laws of physics
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one exists within the momentum of perpetual motion; hence surrounded by temporary form. When trying to mimic perpetual motion; we ignore that all form used to mimic perpetual motion represents a momentary state aka within the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
As for the laws of physics...PHYS'IC, [Greek, from, nature; to produce.] That implies form produced by flow; hence the source of being moved representing the laws of nature for all responses within.
Temporary choice represents the center of ongoing perceivable momentum (balance), and the suggested choices by others can imbalance choice.
free energy
Free implies within dominance aka Momentum represents balance in motion; "free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice (evaluation) within balance (value) aka temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss) represents being ONE within ALL; while implying that ALL is ONE in EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal balance (self sustenance) of energy represents flow/form aka loss/growth aka potentiality/potential aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka source/resource. The parasite sleight of hand (notice of liability) for this goes "all for one and one for all" or "there can only be one". Alone represents allegory for ALL(in)ONE.
over-unity
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". That both represents you aka the ONE (form) within ALL (flow) and the ONEness of ALL (energy). Meanwhile; over/under represents balance (value) for evaluating choice.
The parasitic few suggest the word "unity" as the inversion of oneness...togetherness; which ignores that the flowing ALL self segregates into the formed ONEs. Why? Because perceivable differences in motion represents communicated inspiration required for individual self sustenance (growth) within collective destruction (loss).
The parasites suggest the ignorant many to seek order out of chaos as the inversion of temporary form within ongoing flow representing "chaos out of order"; hence the struggle to sustain self.
there's no need to say "it's fake" or "it's a scam"
As choice within balance (need/want); need represents perceived inspiration; while want represents suggested information. Those who fall for the temptation of suggested information are causing the want versus not want conflict (imbalance) among themselves. The parasitic few...
a) utilize suggestion of want to deceive the many to ignore need
b) suggest the resulting conflict of want vs not want to mean "reason; logic"
c) utilize choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, to gain mass consent and thereby the power to define (suggestion); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any suggested meaning for mass population control aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
d) both sides reasoning about any suggested meaning are ignoring that only those making the suggestion have the free will of choice to define; redefine and contradict the meaning; not those who ignore their free will of choice when consenting to want or not want suggested information by the choices of others.
e) true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; pepsi vs coke etc. represent rebranding of the same want vs not want imbalance; caused by ignoring to respond as choice to perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
based on real science
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka knowledge aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information (scientism). In other words...perceived (reality); suggested (fiction). There is only one perceivable source (flow) for all those perceiving it within (form).
That being said...before the suggested word (fiction) comes the perceived sound (reality). "Insane Person" represents suggested fiction; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived reality, yet only free will of choice can discern itself within balance (perceived) or imbalance (suggested).
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
because anyone else who falls in this category already believes that
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
I assure you that this technology is very real
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
If anyone is genuinely interested in learning more about the suppressed science or suppressed technologies that exploit it, ask me anything!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here.
Badge of honor, if you ask me!
This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
I think the widespread scientific illiteracy also plays a large part in creating an environment where they can thrive. The people who attend these "conventions" are impressed by the bullshit, and don't know enough about science to evaluate it or criticize it properly.
As temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) one exists within the momentum of perpetual motion; hence surrounded by temporary form. When trying to mimic perpetual motion; we ignore that all form used to mimic perpetual motion represents a momentary state aka within the ever changing moment(um) of motion.
As for the laws of physics...PHYS'IC, [Greek, from, nature; to produce.] That implies form produced by flow; hence the source of being moved representing the laws of nature for all responses within.
Temporary choice represents the center of ongoing perceivable momentum (balance), and the suggested choices by others can imbalance choice.
Free implies within dominance aka Momentum represents balance in motion; "free" will of choice represents the response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice (evaluation) within balance (value) aka temporary resistance (growth) within ongoing velocity (loss) represents being ONE within ALL; while implying that ALL is ONE in EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power".
The internal balance (self sustenance) of energy represents flow/form aka loss/growth aka potentiality/potential aka velocity/resistance aka electric/magnetic aka ongoing/temporary aka source/resource. The parasite sleight of hand (notice of liability) for this goes "all for one and one for all" or "there can only be one". Alone represents allegory for ALL(in)ONE.
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". That both represents you aka the ONE (form) within ALL (flow) and the ONEness of ALL (energy). Meanwhile; over/under represents balance (value) for evaluating choice.
The parasitic few suggest the word "unity" as the inversion of oneness...togetherness; which ignores that the flowing ALL self segregates into the formed ONEs. Why? Because perceivable differences in motion represents communicated inspiration required for individual self sustenance (growth) within collective destruction (loss).
The parasites suggest the ignorant many to seek order out of chaos as the inversion of temporary form within ongoing flow representing "chaos out of order"; hence the struggle to sustain self.
As choice within balance (need/want); need represents perceived inspiration; while want represents suggested information. Those who fall for the temptation of suggested information are causing the want versus not want conflict (imbalance) among themselves. The parasitic few...
a) utilize suggestion of want to deceive the many to ignore need
b) suggest the resulting conflict of want vs not want to mean "reason; logic"
c) utilize choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, to gain mass consent and thereby the power to define (suggestion); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any suggested meaning for mass population control aka division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
d) both sides reasoning about any suggested meaning are ignoring that only those making the suggestion have the free will of choice to define; redefine and contradict the meaning; not those who ignore their free will of choice when consenting to want or not want suggested information by the choices of others.
e) true vs false; good vs bad; believing vs not believing; pepsi vs coke etc. represent rebranding of the same want vs not want imbalance; caused by ignoring to respond as choice to perceived balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want).
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka knowledge aka perceived inspiration; not suggested information (scientism). In other words...perceived (reality); suggested (fiction). There is only one perceivable source (flow) for all those perceiving it within (form).
That being said...before the suggested word (fiction) comes the perceived sound (reality). "Insane Person" represents suggested fiction; "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) represents perceived reality, yet only free will of choice can discern itself within balance (perceived) or imbalance (suggested).
I am not like the other ones. I actually understand the laws of physics, where they come from, and how/why. Things are never impossible because the "laws" say so. That is a profoundly stupid belief and lays bare a depressingly feeble grasp on physics and science.
Belief has no place in knowledge, least of all scientific, and is directly across purposes to objective study of any kind (it's called bias)
No, it isn't. At least not what bearden the fraud was peddling. Change my mind!
Have you built a perpetual motion machine following bearden's instructions? If so, how long has it been running without intervention or charging/fuel (that you add) of any sort?
Also, would you consider discussing this topic further on the community I created specifically for such discussions? This is a wonderful example, and its thorough evaluation and research approach(es) to validating bearden's claims could be very useful to others!
If you have a scientific mind you are downvoted to hell 'round here. I like excepticism but they should not doubt the method, they should doubt the experiment or the man who carried it out. This is what the "I am the science" scammers have caused
Good advice! Now, why won't you share this science so we can do that? Bearden has no science to share, I've already determined that.
But assuming my determination is in error, can you provide some science? Pretty please with sugar on top?
Badge of honor, if you ask me!
I think the widespread scientific illiteracy also plays a large part in creating an environment where they can thrive. The people who attend these "conventions" are impressed by the bullshit, and don't know enough about science to evaluate it or criticize it properly.