I have been spending quite a bit of time on this topic over the past few years, and I've come up kind of on the fence.

On one hand, there are some very clear BS fakes in the nuclear bomb footage archives. There is also many photos and videos of military stacking piles of TNT the size of buildings to simulate nuclear explosions and test things. Whenever you see somebody wasting that kind of time that it would take to stack hundreds of thousands of sticks of TNT just to supposedly test the effects of something completely predictable it makes you wonder "are the supposed nukes actually TNT explosions as well?

The other day somebody posted Bill Gates comments about how the vaccine should be thought of similarly to the Manhattan project and the Apollo missions. Well, we know that at least one of these was completely fake (the Apollo missions), and if Bill Gates is comparing these three things, it's fairly easy to also see that the vaccines were about control. If we know that the Russians have never cast public doubt on the Apollo missions, but there is no doubt in any of our minds that the Russians knew they were fake, then it's very easy to imagine a scenario where both countries put the fear of God into their populations by making them think that we were always on the verge of sending missiles back-and-forth that would clear the planet of fauna for centuries. If we know that the Apollo missions caused people to start focusing on television, and we know that the Manhattan project made everybody afraid that we were always going to be at risk of nuclear war, and we know that the ostensible vaccines are being used to create digital ID/social credit systems, then it's easy to come to the conclusion that all three of these are fake in the exact same way, and by that I mean 100% fake.

However, the reason I still remain on the fence about nukes is because of certain governmental/military initiatives, such as the efforts and money put into keeping doomsday planes in the air and deep underground nuclear bunkers, etc.

Pertaining nuclear energy in general, it is highly plausible that generating nuclear power is totally a thing, and the only thing that is bogus is the notion of runaway nuclear reactions, a.k.a. critical mass, the thing that is required to cause all of the energy to be depleted in nanoseconds, resulting in huge explosions. It's possible that we have tried to do this and failed, but then used the efforts to convince everybody to be scared. It's also possible that they knew these things couldn't be done to begin with but they still wanted to scare people into submission.

I remain on the fence.