Thanks to u/dontkillmehillary for the winning suggestion and for the link to the Oliver Stone produced documentary from 2016, "Ukraine On Fire".
Western/NATO media presents a very one sided narrative with regards to Ukraine. Here's a twitter thread I discovered the other day which gives a crude crash course in the side of the narrative that gets neglected by our beloved western presstitutes:
Clinton involvement with the Ukraine goes back to Bill's first term as President. This was just after the Soviet Union ended, and the Clinton Presidency promised economic support for the fledgling democracy.
Since this time the USA has given $billions to Ukraine in financial aid, despite Ukraine being one of Eastern Europe's stronger economies.
The Clintons also have very close ties with Ukrainian oil and gas companies. They are financially connected through the Clinton Foundation to gas pipeline and gas rail car manufacturers. Burisma, also Ukrainian oil and gas, has ties to the Obamas and Bidens.
Just before Russia annexed Crimea, Ukraine was speculating plans to create a gas pipeline through Crimea to Syria/Iran in order to avoid being forced to use Russian gas pipelines. I suspect this is why Hillary was willing to gamble war with Russia over control of Syria. By invading Crimea early, Putin cock-blocked Clintons promises to rich Ukrainians, and the 2016 election was her opportunity to try and fix that.
Where these is fossil fuels, there is a lot of money, and where there is a lot of money there is a lot of politicians trying to get a piece of it.
I agree with this ^. Wanted to add: there's also a geopolitical currency aspect related to saudi/usd EU/US and the gold/gas china/Russia. As western fiat understandably collapses the later becomes the de facto replacement