Probably, but the homeless problem won't be solved by giving them houses. %95 of them WANT to be on the street. You can't smoke rocks and work in a cubicle unless you're at CNN or NYT. You can't be shitfaced and keep a job but you can stand there with a sign.
incredible statistic. I can't imagine an investor owning a home, paying property taxes, paying for maintenance and getting no cash flow but it happens. maybe vacation properties are part of it but dang.
No abandoned homes here, and tons of homeless. Average house price is around $1.2 million.
Given the brick and design of the houses in your image, I'm guessing that it freezes there. What homeless person in their right mind would be homeless and on drugs in a place like that?
Probably, but the homeless problem won't be solved by giving them houses. %95 of them WANT to be on the street. You can't smoke rocks and work in a cubicle unless you're at CNN or NYT. You can't be shitfaced and keep a job but you can stand there with a sign.
The same reason local jurisdictions enact building codes to prevent tiny houses.
The tiny house thing is one of the biggest and stupidest grifts ever.
Uh... not necessarily. Seniors for instance but who are in assisted or long term care facilities would account for some of that number.
incredible statistic. I can't imagine an investor owning a home, paying property taxes, paying for maintenance and getting no cash flow but it happens. maybe vacation properties are part of it but dang.
Give them all a house and you will have 3.5 million condemned homes within five years.
People do not respect that which is not earned.
No abandoned homes here, and tons of homeless. Average house price is around $1.2 million.
Given the brick and design of the houses in your image, I'm guessing that it freezes there. What homeless person in their right mind would be homeless and on drugs in a place like that?