Because it really seems like flat earth is just a derivative of Christian delusion.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
I don’t believe in Christianity per say, but I do value the morality that accompanies it.
The earth is flat and non-rotating as perceived by anyone before they are introduced to NASA Dogma in your psychological conditioning centres called schools. NASA even admits it is flat and non-rotating. There are numerous smart pilots that have added to the long list of FE proofs.
Also, name one pilot who thinks the earth is flat.
https://youtu.be/L2dHcI2oSDQ
A phone interview with a literal who that won't even give their real name? And you think this qualifies as "evidence?"
No wonder you'll believe literally anything.
I said name one pilot. One.
There’s an F4 Phantom pilot as well that gives his name. Don’t be lazy, you’re either interested or not.
No curve is visible at 120,000’. DeGrasse Tyson even admits this.
A couple amateur rockets up that high show no curve as well.
That is a go pro, it has a fish eye lens. It will curve the horizon above the centre of the lens. Had he pointed it more at the sky, it would have shown a concave curve. https://youtu.be/wdjxzh1O_X8
DeGrasse Tyson thought magical gas made the cold light blocking Nitrogen atmospheric bath a heater because of fire sin.
The view from this Red Bull highest jump to Earth in history is NOT because of fish-eye lens distortion.
https://youtu.be/vvbN-cWe0A0?t=38
Neither you nor that hillbilly Tyson have the first clue what you're talking about.
Lol nice try my friend. https://youtu.be/utaobPEP0WM
Yes you can. I worked on dozens of mountaintops in the Western US repairing and maintaining communications networks.
You can see curvature from the top of a 60 foot mast on a boat.
No, they don't.
So now you trust NASA?
Yes they do. In several documents in fact, pour a stiff drink and check it out. https://www.galileolied.com/post/15-nasa-research-papers-admit-flat-nonrotating
No: they don't. There is a standard in papers related to things in motion for indicating your analysis does not include motion effects on certain planes, so that people reviewing thousands of pages' documentation of projects can know what papers are going to contain.
Since they don't have that in the truck driving business you didn't know about it but it's a standard procedure in government & government contracted technical papers.
It's been done since the middle 20th century as an aid in cataloging the millions of eventual pages,
military & civilian aeronautical and aerospace research was bound to create.