I personally believe it's because they're easily influenced by these very same enemies into shifting the blame to a formless, spooky phantasm but I'm interested in hearing other points of view.
Sorry Christians, not from you. You're all compromised to one degree or another.
omg we Christians are soooooo persecuted!
Oh yeah? Tell me. What year is it? Seems like Christianity "won" a couple thousand years ago.
jews aren’t human.
This is surprisingly coherent.
a) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form] implies out of flow; hence AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]
b) every (ONE) implies out of collective (ALL)
c) does nature communicate itself to every one within through words (brands; idols; suggested information) or does it move everything within; which each ones senses perceived as moving inspiration for choice to adapt to?
d) what if ONEs adaptation to ALL perceived is what grows ONEs comprehension (understanding) thereof? What if suggesting information doesn't grow understanding of ALL (reality); but only what other ONEs suggest it means (fiction)?
e) does one exist before another one explains that one does?
f) what if suggested information (from within form) represents the temptation to ignore perceived inspiration (from within spirit)?
Who suggested those -isms (choice) and who consented to believe (want) or not believe (not want) them? Could it be that before one can choose to consent to suggested want vs not want (conflict of reason); that one needs to respond as choice to balance (need/want) under natural law? Could it be that consent to either want or not want represents the same submission of free will of choice to free will of others?
Perceived sound; shaped by choice into suggested idolized meaning to deceive all who consent to ignore perceived sound. Teaching a so called human languages is referred to as civilizing them; yet teaching a so called animal to consent to words is referred to as domesticating them.