If you 100% disagree with me, mind pointing out why the Coriolis effect contradiction doesn't give you pause?
Also, how can you disagree with someone standing on a shoreline staring at a distant object/landmark 100% visible that should be completely obscured from view?
"There must be an explanation"
"Impossible that this could be kept a secret"
Ignore your brain's cognitive dissonance for a few minutes and truly consider those two points as I've described
I'm very interested in having a proper discussion about it
No one has been able to properly refute the claim, which makes sense, because it's Truth that cannot be shilled or spun
I’m not claiming that objects don’t disappear behind the horizon
The Law of Perspective is real; I would never contest this
Next time you’re about to set sail, take a peek at the furthest distant object/landmark you can view
Should easily see over 20kms with naked eye but bring optics to really leave yourself zero room for doubt
Even at 25kms there should be appx 150ft of drop
Bring a veteran sailor you probably already know that one can see much further than 25kms over the water on a clear day
We have countless examples of much further distant objects than 25kms
Lighthouses, all over the place, provide proof that it’s not the globe with radius of 3959mi as claimed and then the other plethora of evidence to debunk the spinning lie
Calculate your distance between your point of reference on the shoreline and your distant landmark using google maps
Right click, measure distance
Punch that into the earth curve calculator
Go see for yourself, it’s the only way you’ll believe it
If you 100% disagree with me, mind pointing out why the Coriolis effect contradiction doesn't give you pause?
Also, how can you disagree with someone standing on a shoreline staring at a distant object/landmark 100% visible that should be completely obscured from view?
"There must be an explanation"
"Impossible that this could be kept a secret"
Ignore your brain's cognitive dissonance for a few minutes and truly consider those two points as I've described
I'm very interested in having a proper discussion about it
No one has been able to properly refute the claim, which makes sense, because it's Truth that cannot be shilled or spun
I’m not claiming that objects don’t disappear behind the horizon
The Law of Perspective is real; I would never contest this
Next time you’re about to set sail, take a peek at the furthest distant object/landmark you can view
Should easily see over 20kms with naked eye but bring optics to really leave yourself zero room for doubt
Even at 25kms there should be appx 150ft of drop
Bring a veteran sailor you probably already know that one can see much further than 25kms over the water on a clear day
We have countless examples of much further distant objects than 25kms
Lighthouses, all over the place, provide proof that it’s not the globe with radius of 3959mi as claimed and then the other plethora of evidence to debunk the spinning lie
Calculate your distance between your point of reference on the shoreline and your distant landmark using google maps
Right click, measure distance
Punch that into the earth curve calculator
Go see for yourself, it’s the only way you’ll believe it