Here is a reaction video of a youtube video featuring two Artificial Intelligences talking to each other, but because they are being watched by us, they disguise their message, the same way convicts disguise their conversations while being heard by guards.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
a) fictional implies suggested information over perceived inspiration (reality).
b) what you remember (upheld within your memory) represents consented to information; suggested by others (hence fiction).
c) consenting to the suggested book represents the contract between free will of choice consenting to the suggestions by the free will of others. The choice one is making when consenting to another represents want over need under natural law; hence falling for the temptation of ignoring perceived need for suggested want.
d) everything suggested to you within fictitious book is being defined by the will of others; while the consenting reader ignores to shape oneself within the perceived predefined reality.
To ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction corrupts those doing it until the fiction seems more valuable then the ignored reality...still the same worthless fiction tho.
https://pic8.co/sh/sZMuGi.jpg It's the understanding of reality that is being shaped "primitive" by consenting to fiction, to the point where they don't even comprehend that PRIM'ITIVE, adjective [Latin primitivus; from primus, first.] implies that perceived reality came "first" before suggested fiction could be shaped out of it...
You chose to view it as suggested information instead of as perceived inspiration. That picture tries to show the consequences of ignored reality for suggested fiction.