Sure there are a few morons who don't know any better and fell for it, but the vast majority of the posters want to destroy the achievements of the white man and make anyone associated with conspiracies look like a looney tune.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
https://youtu.be/Q1m-nNAZqZw?list=PLimb_UpOKm97RBTHJ_ehaz2W-wNOnTkrl
Learning about 8 inches per mile squared of drop/curvature really fucked me up, how can I see things that I shouldn't be able to see on a curved surface, and no, refraction doesn't make up all the missing drop, or at least I haven't been convinced as such.
That being said, I don't know where I stand, I know NASA produces almost exclusively bullshit, photoshops, greenscreens etc - So I know that I can't trust them with much certainty. However, the 'flat earth' community, or any opinion that doesn't have to go through some kind of vetting/authoritative body is also hugely open to just being wrong or incorrect in any number of ways.
They're getting good. You almost seem human. Planting seeds of doubt then saying "but I don't know."
Mate, if you think I'm a bot and not just a regular human being who isn't wholly convinced one way or the other, but that finds the dialog, topic and general conversation interesting, then maybe you've gone too far down the rabbit hole. Don't get me wrong, there are obviously a lot of bots on the internet, but your quippy dismissive 1 liners are far more bot-like than this response or my response above.
I'll level with you: after chasing my tail trying to have genuine engagement with flat earthers and flat earth fence sitters, I've learned the only way to deal is through ridicule.
Ridicule? That's pathetic. What is interesting to me is that this should not be a subject. If only there was one true picture above earth. Just one is all it would take, that wasn't NASA. You would think there would be one by now. I'm a fuckall, dont care either way, but it does seem that if you are round earther, you believe in NASA . That's why round earthers are the worst anal bastards I ever come across.
How do you rationalise the 8inches per mile squared drop-off due to curvature, and the subsequent many tests of people sighting objects that were present (buildings) or that they placed (light sources) or in some instances lasers, over distances that should presumably be curved, according to the globe model