40
posted ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl ago by AlwysHideUrPowerLevl +42 / -2

Roe V. Wade set several precedents. One of these legal precedents was to uphold the right to individual bodily autonomy in medical decisions. (obviously "bodily autonomy" doesn't apply if you consider the fetus to be a separate life. But that was not the court's take)

Back to the main point: They cannot mandate the vaccine if you have a right to bodily autonomy in medical decisions.

And even without a federal law like Roe, blue states would still keep abortion legal.

So I suspect the federal government is willing to sacrifice Roe V. Wade if it means they can mandate the vaccine.

Thoughts?