I was mulling over the idea of whether the Rittenhouse Event may have been a Deep State Plot.
While comparing to other mass shooting events, I noticed that most media-covered shootings happen within walking distance of a Hospital. Now I'm wondering if it's Deep State Protocol that dangerous false flags must be executed near a trauma facility, in case of bystander injuries...
My data is the following:
-
(number of hospitals in the state) / (square miles area in the state) = Mean Coverage Area per Hospital
-
Distance of shooting Event from Hospital
-
Percentile nearness-to-hospital (DEH²/MCAH)
With these calculations, I ran a list of half a dozen media-hyped shooting events from the past 15 years or so. In each one, you'll find that the shooting event occurred within the nearest 1-2% of a hospital's coverage area. Weird.
- Virginia Tech shooting: 3.1mi, 98%
- Sandy Hook: 0.1mi, 99%
- Parkland: 2.6mi, 98%
- Vegas: 0.1mi, 99%
- New Zealand: 1mi, 99%
- Kenosha: 0.1mi, 99%
- Astroworld(?): 3.3mi, 99%
If you want to avoid dying to the FBI's false flags, don't go within a mile of the hospital.
Edit:
- Pulse Nightclub: 0.3mi, 99%
- Gilroy Garlic: 4.1mi, 96%
- Columbine High: 6.9mi, 95%
Agreed.
Wow.
Pulse Nightclub was 0.26mi from a Level 1 trauma center, Orlando Arnold Palmer Hospital.
The hospital boasts they are the only Level 1 trauma center in central Florida.
Each hospital covers a ~300sqmi area, why are all the mass shootings with strange media bias within 1sqmi of a hospital?
I'm saying it's an MO of the Deep State.
If you only knew how bad things really are 😉
This is super interesting. Would it be relatively simple for you to place random pins on a map in various cities and then run the analysis on these pins' coordinates, to see what the average distance percentile is for random locations within a given city. I think to be fair he would want to make sure that pins are dropped within urban areas of each city, since that's where these fake shootings tend to take place.