a) try to form a "new" thought without using reality as inspiration to think about. If you can't then you should question why you believe in suggested "new" when you cannot perceive such a state within reality?
b) Pig-Latin (English) represents the "one" world slave language that is rapidly casting all the other languages aside; thanks to the world wide web propagating it. English is robbed of all natural connotations; under constant revisionism; filled to the brim with rhetorical deceptions; used as legalese to hide maritime admiralty law under common law (both representing layers of deception upon natural law), and fully numerical encoded (gematria) to allow communication underneath language.
c) I haven't much looked into Esperanto; but that so called jew designed it around the same trick as all other suggested languages...the ignorance of the many towards nature representing the source for perceived sound; while consenting to shaped words as idolized meaning, suggested by the choice of others towards ones own free will of choice.
Within nature one represents an insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound); and our free will of choice represents the response (resound aka resonance) to balance (momentum) caused by how nature communicates sound (by ongoing flow) to all within (temporary form); hence us representing form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
In short...choice is defined as the response to balance (need/want); while the suggested choices by others (want vs not want) represent the temptation to ignore balance. That is what the few parasitically exploit among the many by means of suggestions.
Nature represents natural order (velocity of flow); those within (resistance of form) represent the response to it. Adaptation as choice to balance (momentum) in motion represents choice of need for self sustenance; while ignoring it represents choice of want over need. This is how one can ignore resisting the natural order for following the suggested orders by others.
d) the guide-stones suggest the "age of reason", and reason represents the conflict between want vs not want; caused by consenting to any suggestion. The few suggest (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many. What they're reasoning about is irrelevant; because a) they all act in ignorance of balance when consenting to want or not want the suggested choices by others and b) only those who suggest have the power to define what it means for those who consent to the suggested.
All their rhetorical games...identity politics; hate-speech; pronouns; linguistical revisionism; black vs white; left vs right; true vs false; believing vs not believing and so on, represents reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested idolized meaning (words) aka spell-craft.
Languages do not represent communication under natural law....resonance does...as choice to balance; not as choice seeking agreement with suggested choices by others.
If it is then it completely failed
a) try to form a "new" thought without using reality as inspiration to think about. If you can't then you should question why you believe in suggested "new" when you cannot perceive such a state within reality?
b) Pig-Latin (English) represents the "one" world slave language that is rapidly casting all the other languages aside; thanks to the world wide web propagating it. English is robbed of all natural connotations; under constant revisionism; filled to the brim with rhetorical deceptions; used as legalese to hide maritime admiralty law under common law (both representing layers of deception upon natural law), and fully numerical encoded (gematria) to allow communication underneath language.
c) I haven't much looked into Esperanto; but that so called jew designed it around the same trick as all other suggested languages...the ignorance of the many towards nature representing the source for perceived sound; while consenting to shaped words as idolized meaning, suggested by the choice of others towards ones own free will of choice.
Within nature one represents an insane (in sanus aka within sound) person (per sonos aka by sound); and our free will of choice represents the response (resound aka resonance) to balance (momentum) caused by how nature communicates sound (by ongoing flow) to all within (temporary form); hence us representing form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
In short...choice is defined as the response to balance (need/want); while the suggested choices by others (want vs not want) represent the temptation to ignore balance. That is what the few parasitically exploit among the many by means of suggestions.
Nature represents natural order (velocity of flow); those within (resistance of form) represent the response to it. Adaptation as choice to balance (momentum) in motion represents choice of need for self sustenance; while ignoring it represents choice of want over need. This is how one can ignore resisting the natural order for following the suggested orders by others.
d) the guide-stones suggest the "age of reason", and reason represents the conflict between want vs not want; caused by consenting to any suggestion. The few suggest (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many. What they're reasoning about is irrelevant; because a) they all act in ignorance of balance when consenting to want or not want the suggested choices by others and b) only those who suggest have the power to define what it means for those who consent to the suggested.
All their rhetorical games...identity politics; hate-speech; pronouns; linguistical revisionism; black vs white; left vs right; true vs false; believing vs not believing and so on, represents reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested idolized meaning (words) aka spell-craft.
Languages do not represent communication under natural law....resonance does...as choice to balance; not as choice seeking agreement with suggested choices by others.