From May 2019 Journal of Nanobiotechnology 17(1)
DOI:10.1186/s12951-019-0506-y
"Biochemical functionality of magnetic particles as nanosensors: how far away are we to implement them into clinical practice?" --May 2019
Start reading around the 100th citation mark.
"Nanoparticles, once present in the body, may target various systems. Here are effects of nanoparticles found on the circulatory system, where nanoparticles indirectly influence for example blood pressure [98]. Important to note when looking at the circulatory system is the fact that nanoparticles are engineered to influence the coagulation system of the blood [99]. At the same time, MNPs, designed for any other indication, may evoke an unwanted pro- or anticoagulant effect in the blood [100]."
"The reproductive system is another target of nanoparticles with possible detrimental effects. Upon in-vivo applications, nanoparticles may accumulate in reproductive organs [102, 103], where they have direct effects on germ cells with reduced cell count or activity in both, female and male germ cells [104, 105]. Furthermore, nanoparticles are able to alter or damage DNA in cells, which would be especially problematic in germ cells [106]. In a recent in-vitro study, uptake of coated SPIONs in granulosa cells was tested. It was found that depending on the coating, no or only low uptake and toxicity of SPIONs was observed [107].
Since it is now known that the vax spike protein enters cells and damages the DNA repair mechanism, we can see that the combination of that and the nanoparticle damage to DNA are a one-two punch that can easily induce cancer.
It was found that depending on the coating, no or only low uptake and toxicity of SPIONs was observed
So are the vaxes that are causing immediate trouble part of lots that have a different or degraded coating? Is the coating on these flawed vaccine accidental or on purpose?
And of course the big question: is the main purpose of all of this graphene oxide that coincides with starlink and 5g rollout to create human-to-machine interfaces so that humans can be remotely connected to computer systems?
If so, is it for control via subtle thought manipulation that the human isn't even aware of, or a blackmail solution that places your continued health in the hands of a few operators that can push a button to shut you down?
I suppose those of us who survive will probably see some of those answers in the years ahead.
The emerging field of medical nanorobotics is exciting. Ray Kurzweil says that it (along with other technologies) could virtually eliminate disease and aging by the end of the 2030s.
Submission Statement:
From May 2019 Journal of Nanobiotechnology 17(1) DOI:10.1186/s12951-019-0506-y
"Biochemical functionality of magnetic particles as nanosensors: how far away are we to implement them into clinical practice?" --May 2019
Start reading around the 100th citation mark.
"Nanoparticles, once present in the body, may target various systems. Here are effects of nanoparticles found on the circulatory system, where nanoparticles indirectly influence for example blood pressure [98]. Important to note when looking at the circulatory system is the fact that nanoparticles are engineered to influence the coagulation system of the blood [99]. At the same time, MNPs, designed for any other indication, may evoke an unwanted pro- or anticoagulant effect in the blood [100]."
"The reproductive system is another target of nanoparticles with possible detrimental effects. Upon in-vivo applications, nanoparticles may accumulate in reproductive organs [102, 103], where they have direct effects on germ cells with reduced cell count or activity in both, female and male germ cells [104, 105]. Furthermore, nanoparticles are able to alter or damage DNA in cells, which would be especially problematic in germ cells [106]. In a recent in-vitro study, uptake of coated SPIONs in granulosa cells was tested. It was found that depending on the coating, no or only low uptake and toxicity of SPIONs was observed [107].
[credit to David Botha]
Since it is now known that the vax spike protein enters cells and damages the DNA repair mechanism, we can see that the combination of that and the nanoparticle damage to DNA are a one-two punch that can easily induce cancer.
So are the vaxes that are causing immediate trouble part of lots that have a different or degraded coating? Is the coating on these flawed vaccine accidental or on purpose?
And of course the big question: is the main purpose of all of this graphene oxide that coincides with starlink and 5g rollout to create human-to-machine interfaces so that humans can be remotely connected to computer systems?
If so, is it for control via subtle thought manipulation that the human isn't even aware of, or a blackmail solution that places your continued health in the hands of a few operators that can push a button to shut you down?
I suppose those of us who survive will probably see some of those answers in the years ahead.
The emerging field of medical nanorobotics is exciting. Ray Kurzweil says that it (along with other technologies) could virtually eliminate disease and aging by the end of the 2030s.